LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Google logo

gemini-3.8-flash-highvsgpt-oss:20b

OpenAI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

gemini-3.8-flash-high

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

gemini-3.8-flash-highBetter fit

1,000,000 tokens

gpt-oss:20b

128,000 tokens

Input formats

gemini-3.8-flash-high

text, image

gpt-oss:20b

text

Vision

gemini-3.8-flash-highBetter fit

Supported

gpt-oss:20b

Not supported

JSON mode

gemini-3.8-flash-high

Not supported

gpt-oss:20bBetter fit

Supported

Reasoning

gemini-3.8-flash-highBetter fit

Supported

gpt-oss:20b

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

gemini-3.8-flash-high · leads in 27

67%

Moderate

gpt-oss:20b · leads in 2

30%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads77%
    gpt-oss:20b26%
  • Logical reasoning

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads70%
    gpt-oss:20b14%
  • Mathematics

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads73%
    gpt-oss:20b23%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads70%
    gpt-oss:20b24%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads67%
    gpt-oss:20b15%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads50%
    gpt-oss:20b32%
  • Debugging and code review

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads61%
    gpt-oss:20b26%
  • Agentic coding

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads64%
    gpt-oss:20b26%
  • Tool and function calling

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads66%
    gpt-oss:20b30%
  • SQL and query writing

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads61%
    gpt-oss:20b27%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads58%
    gpt-oss:20b26%
  • Professional writing

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads58%
    gpt-oss:20b24%
  • Conversational quality

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads65%
    gpt-oss:20b21%
  • Multilingual ability

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads99%
    gpt-oss:20b28%
  • Translation

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads77%
    gpt-oss:20b25%
  • Summarization

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads76%
    gpt-oss:20b21%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads75%
    gpt-oss:20b22%
  • Professional domains

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads66%
    gpt-oss:20b19%
  • Information extraction

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads48%
    gpt-oss:20b30%
  • Classification and labeling

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads77%
    gpt-oss:20b31%
  • Long-context handling

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads89%
    gpt-oss:20b26%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads43%
    gpt-oss:20b23%
  • Structured output

    gemini-3.8-flash-high9%
    gpt-oss:20bLeads46%
  • Factual accuracy

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads72%
    gpt-oss:20b25%
  • Safety and alignment

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads68%
    gpt-oss:20b24%
  • Steerability

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads51%
    gpt-oss:20b23%
  • Output consistency

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads58%
    gpt-oss:20b51%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads87%
    gpt-oss:20b69%
  • Cost efficiency

    gemini-3.8-flash-high75%
    gpt-oss:20bLeads80%
  • Image understanding

    gemini-3.8-flash-high86%
    gpt-oss:20bNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

gemini-3.8-flash-high

95.32%

gpt-oss:20b

99.11%

Average response time

gemini-3.8-flash-high

13,827.75 ms

gpt-oss:20b

2,686.07 ms

P95 API latency

gemini-3.8-flash-high

60,000 ms

gpt-oss:20b

10,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.8-flash-high: 85.7%gpt-oss:20b: 99.3%
24 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.8-flash-high: 20,426 msgpt-oss:20b: 2,509 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.8-flash-high: 60,000 msgpt-oss:20b: 10,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • gemini-3.8-flash-high has a larger context window.
  • gemini-3.8-flash-high supports image input while the other model does not.
  • gpt-oss:20b recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • gpt-oss:20b recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring