gpt-oss:20b
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-oss:20bvsminimax-m2.7
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
minimax-m2.7
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gpt-oss:20b
128,000 tokens
minimax-m2.7Better fit
180,000 tokens
Streaming
gpt-oss:20bBetter fit
Supported
minimax-m2.7
Not supported
Reasoning
gpt-oss:20b
Not supported
minimax-m2.7Better fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-oss:20b · leads in 2
30%
Weak
minimax-m2.7 · leads in 27
41%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-oss:20b26%minimax-m2.7Leads27%Logical reasoning
gpt-oss:20b14%minimax-m2.7Leads42%Mathematics
gpt-oss:20b23%minimax-m2.7Leads40%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-oss:20b24%minimax-m2.7Leads29%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-oss:20b15%minimax-m2.7Leads44%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-oss:20bLeads32%minimax-m2.730%Debugging and code review
gpt-oss:20b26%minimax-m2.7Leads37%Agentic coding
gpt-oss:20b26%minimax-m2.7Leads46%Tool and function calling
gpt-oss:20b30%minimax-m2.7Leads44%SQL and query writing
gpt-oss:20b27%minimax-m2.7Leads37%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-oss:20b26%minimax-m2.7Leads30%Professional writing
gpt-oss:20b24%minimax-m2.7Leads30%Conversational quality
gpt-oss:20b21%minimax-m2.7Leads36%Multilingual ability
gpt-oss:20b28%minimax-m2.7Leads60%Translation
gpt-oss:20b25%minimax-m2.7Leads42%Summarization
gpt-oss:20b21%minimax-m2.7Leads31%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-oss:20b22%minimax-m2.7Leads36%Professional domains
gpt-oss:20b19%minimax-m2.7Leads28%Information extraction
gpt-oss:20b30%minimax-m2.7Leads42%Classification and labeling
gpt-oss:20b31%minimax-m2.7Leads43%Long-context handling
gpt-oss:20b26%minimax-m2.7Leads35%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-oss:20b23%minimax-m2.7Leads39%Structured output
gpt-oss:20b46%minimax-m2.7Leads47%Factual accuracy
gpt-oss:20b25%minimax-m2.7Leads31%Safety and alignment
gpt-oss:20b24%minimax-m2.7Leads30%Steerability
gpt-oss:20b23%minimax-m2.7Leads37%Output consistency
gpt-oss:20bLeads51%minimax-m2.748%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-oss:20b69%minimax-m2.7Leads72%Cost efficiency
gpt-oss:20b80%minimax-m2.7Leads87%Image understanding
gpt-oss:20bNo image inputminimax-m2.7No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-oss:20b
99.11%
minimax-m2.7
89.62%
Average response time
gpt-oss:20b
2,686.07 ms
minimax-m2.7
22,830.99 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-oss:20b
10,000 ms
minimax-m2.7
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-oss:20b: 99.3%minimax-m2.7: 92.9%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-oss:20b: 2,509 msminimax-m2.7: 19,194 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-oss:20b: 10,000 msminimax-m2.7: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- minimax-m2.7 has a larger context window.
- gpt-oss:20b recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- gpt-oss:20b recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.