LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Google logo

gemini-3.8-flash-highvsgemini-4-argon

Google logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

gemini-3.8-flash-high

Checking current pricing…

gemini-4-argon

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

gemini-3.8-flash-high

text, image

gemini-4-argon

text

Vision

gemini-3.8-flash-highBetter fit

Supported

gemini-4-argon

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

gemini-3.8-flash-high · leads in 8

67%

Moderate

gemini-4-argon · leads in 16

65%

Moderate

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads77%
    gemini-4-argon74%
  • Logical reasoning

    gemini-3.8-flash-high70%
    gemini-4-argon70%
  • Mathematics

    gemini-3.8-flash-high73%
    gemini-4-argonLeads74%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    gemini-3.8-flash-high70%
    gemini-4-argonLeads75%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads67%
    gemini-4-argon66%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    gemini-3.8-flash-high50%
    gemini-4-argonLeads54%
  • Debugging and code review

    gemini-3.8-flash-high61%
    gemini-4-argonLeads64%
  • Agentic coding

    gemini-3.8-flash-high64%
    gemini-4-argonLeads65%
  • Tool and function calling

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads66%
    gemini-4-argon65%
  • SQL and query writing

    gemini-3.8-flash-high61%
    gemini-4-argonLeads64%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    gemini-3.8-flash-high58%
    gemini-4-argonLeads59%
  • Professional writing

    gemini-3.8-flash-high58%
    gemini-4-argonLeads60%
  • Conversational quality

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads65%
    gemini-4-argon64%
  • Multilingual ability

    gemini-3.8-flash-high99%
    gemini-4-argonLeads100%
  • Translation

    gemini-3.8-flash-high77%
    gemini-4-argon77%
  • Summarization

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads76%
    gemini-4-argon75%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    gemini-3.8-flash-high75%
    gemini-4-argonLeads76%
  • Professional domains

    gemini-3.8-flash-high66%
    gemini-4-argonLeads68%
  • Information extraction

    gemini-3.8-flash-high48%
    gemini-4-argonLeads51%
  • Classification and labeling

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads77%
    gemini-4-argon71%
  • Long-context handling

    gemini-3.8-flash-high89%
    gemini-4-argon89%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    gemini-3.8-flash-high43%
    gemini-4-argonLeads44%
  • Structured output

    gemini-3.8-flash-high9%
    gemini-4-argon9%
  • Factual accuracy

    gemini-3.8-flash-high72%
    gemini-4-argonLeads73%
  • Safety and alignment

    gemini-3.8-flash-high68%
    gemini-4-argon68%
  • Steerability

    gemini-3.8-flash-high51%
    gemini-4-argonLeads53%
  • Output consistency

    gemini-3.8-flash-high58%
    gemini-4-argonLeads63%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads87%
    gemini-4-argon46%
  • Cost efficiency

    gemini-3.8-flash-highLeads75%
    gemini-4-argon57%
  • Image understanding

    gemini-3.8-flash-high86%
    gemini-4-argonNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

gemini-3.8-flash-high

95.32%

gemini-4-argon

70.97%

Average response time

gemini-3.8-flash-high

13,827.75 ms

gemini-4-argon

48,603.09 ms

P95 API latency

gemini-3.8-flash-high

60,000 ms

gemini-4-argon

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.8-flash-high: 85.7%gemini-4-argon: 42.7%
24 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.8-flash-high: 20,426 msgemini-4-argon: 49,932 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.8-flash-high: 60,000 msgemini-4-argon: 60,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • gemini-3.8-flash-high supports image input while the other model does not.
  • gemini-3.8-flash-high recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.

Keep exploring