gemini-3.1-pro
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemini-3.1-provsgemini-4-argon
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gemini-4-argon
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
JSON mode
gemini-3.1-proBetter fit
Supported
gemini-4-argon
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gemini-3.1-pro · leads in 22
69%
Moderate
gemini-4-argon · leads in 7
65%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gemini-3.1-pro73%gemini-4-argonLeads74%Logical reasoning
gemini-3.1-pro69%gemini-4-argonLeads70%Mathematics
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%gemini-4-argon74%Scientific and technical depth
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%gemini-4-argon75%Planning and task decomposition
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%gemini-4-argon66%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gemini-3.1-proLeads64%gemini-4-argon54%Debugging and code review
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%gemini-4-argon64%Agentic coding
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%gemini-4-argon65%Tool and function calling
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%gemini-4-argon65%SQL and query writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%gemini-4-argon64%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads61%gemini-4-argon59%Professional writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%gemini-4-argon60%Conversational quality
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%gemini-4-argon64%Multilingual ability
gemini-3.1-pro98%gemini-4-argonLeads100%Translation
gemini-3.1-proLeads78%gemini-4-argon77%Summarization
gemini-3.1-pro55%gemini-4-argonLeads75%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gemini-3.1-pro75%gemini-4-argonLeads76%Professional domains
gemini-3.1-proLeads70%gemini-4-argon68%Information extraction
gemini-3.1-proLeads72%gemini-4-argon51%Classification and labeling
gemini-3.1-proLeads79%gemini-4-argon71%Long-context handling
gemini-3.1-pro40%gemini-4-argonLeads89%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%gemini-4-argon44%Structured output
gemini-3.1-proLeads77%gemini-4-argon9%Factual accuracy
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%gemini-4-argon73%Safety and alignment
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%gemini-4-argon68%Steerability
gemini-3.1-proLeads62%gemini-4-argon53%Output consistency
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%gemini-4-argon63%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gemini-3.1-proLeads47%gemini-4-argon46%Cost efficiency
gemini-3.1-pro54%gemini-4-argonLeads57%Image understanding
gemini-3.1-proNo image inputgemini-4-argonNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemini-3.1-pro
89.68%
gemini-4-argon
70.97%
Average response time
gemini-3.1-pro
39,780.78 ms
gemini-4-argon
48,603.09 ms
P95 API latency
gemini-3.1-pro
60,000 ms
gemini-4-argon
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 85.7%gemini-4-argon: 42.7%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 43,687 msgemini-4-argon: 49,932 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 60,000 msgemini-4-argon: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gemini-3.1-pro recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.