gemini-3.1-pro
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemini-3.1-provsgpt-oss:20b
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-oss:20b
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Reasoning
gemini-3.1-proBetter fit
Supported
gpt-oss:20b
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gemini-3.1-pro · leads in 27
69%
Moderate
gpt-oss:20b · leads in 2
30%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%gpt-oss:20b26%Logical reasoning
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%gpt-oss:20b14%Mathematics
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%gpt-oss:20b23%Scientific and technical depth
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%gpt-oss:20b24%Planning and task decomposition
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%gpt-oss:20b15%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gemini-3.1-proLeads64%gpt-oss:20b32%Debugging and code review
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%gpt-oss:20b26%Agentic coding
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%gpt-oss:20b26%Tool and function calling
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%gpt-oss:20b30%SQL and query writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%gpt-oss:20b27%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads61%gpt-oss:20b26%Professional writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%gpt-oss:20b24%Conversational quality
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%gpt-oss:20b21%Multilingual ability
gemini-3.1-proLeads98%gpt-oss:20b28%Translation
gemini-3.1-proLeads78%gpt-oss:20b25%Summarization
gemini-3.1-proLeads55%gpt-oss:20b21%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%gpt-oss:20b22%Professional domains
gemini-3.1-proLeads70%gpt-oss:20b19%Information extraction
gemini-3.1-proLeads72%gpt-oss:20b30%Classification and labeling
gemini-3.1-proLeads79%gpt-oss:20b31%Long-context handling
gemini-3.1-proLeads40%gpt-oss:20b26%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%gpt-oss:20b23%Structured output
gemini-3.1-proLeads77%gpt-oss:20b46%Factual accuracy
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%gpt-oss:20b25%Safety and alignment
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%gpt-oss:20b24%Steerability
gemini-3.1-proLeads62%gpt-oss:20b23%Output consistency
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%gpt-oss:20b51%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gemini-3.1-pro47%gpt-oss:20bLeads69%Cost efficiency
gemini-3.1-pro54%gpt-oss:20bLeads80%Image understanding
gemini-3.1-proNo image inputgpt-oss:20bNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemini-3.1-pro
89.68%
gpt-oss:20b
99.11%
Average response time
gemini-3.1-pro
39,780.78 ms
gpt-oss:20b
2,686.07 ms
P95 API latency
gemini-3.1-pro
60,000 ms
gpt-oss:20b
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 85.7%gpt-oss:20b: 99.3%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 43,687 msgpt-oss:20b: 2,509 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 60,000 msgpt-oss:20b: 10,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-oss:20b recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- gpt-oss:20b recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.