LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Mistral AI logo

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407vsseed-2.0-mini

ByteDance logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

Checking current pricing…

seed-2.0-mini

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

128,000 tokens

seed-2.0-miniBetter fit

250,000 tokens

Tool calling

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

Not supported

seed-2.0-miniBetter fit

Supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 · leads in 25

34%

Weak

seed-2.0-mini · leads in 3

21%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads24%
    seed-2.0-mini14%
  • Logical reasoning

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads15%
    seed-2.0-mini8%
  • Mathematics

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads27%
    seed-2.0-mini12%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads23%
    seed-2.0-mini11%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240711%
    seed-2.0-mini11%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads35%
    seed-2.0-mini15%
  • Debugging and code review

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads24%
    seed-2.0-mini13%
  • Agentic coding

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-24078%
    seed-2.0-miniLeads21%
  • Tool and function calling

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-24077%
    seed-2.0-miniLeads23%
  • SQL and query writing

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads35%
    seed-2.0-mini16%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads28%
    seed-2.0-mini12%
  • Professional writing

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads30%
    seed-2.0-mini15%
  • Conversational quality

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads30%
    seed-2.0-mini10%
  • Multilingual ability

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads65%
    seed-2.0-mini16%
  • Translation

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads32%
    seed-2.0-mini13%
  • Summarization

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads25%
    seed-2.0-mini19%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads21%
    seed-2.0-mini16%
  • Professional domains

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads18%
    seed-2.0-mini12%
  • Information extraction

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads35%
    seed-2.0-mini24%
  • Classification and labeling

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads37%
    seed-2.0-mini23%
  • Long-context handling

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240729%
    seed-2.0-miniLeads33%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads45%
    seed-2.0-mini17%
  • Structured output

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads51%
    seed-2.0-mini38%
  • Factual accuracy

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads37%
    seed-2.0-mini16%
  • Safety and alignment

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads33%
    seed-2.0-mini17%
  • Steerability

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads39%
    seed-2.0-mini14%
  • Output consistency

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads71%
    seed-2.0-mini52%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads76%
    seed-2.0-mini68%
  • Cost efficiency

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads84%
    seed-2.0-mini48%
  • Image understanding

    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407No image input
    seed-2.0-miniNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

99.4%

seed-2.0-mini

100%

Average response time

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

5,547.3 ms

seed-2.0-mini

6,796.87 ms

P95 API latency

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

30,000 ms

seed-2.0-mini

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 97.1%seed-2.0-mini: 100%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 2,920 msseed-2.0-mini: 5,772 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 30,000 msseed-2.0-mini: 60,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • seed-2.0-mini has a larger context window.
  • The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
  • mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring