gpt-5.6-luna
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-5.6-lunavsseed-2.0-mini
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
seed-2.0-mini
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
gpt-5.6-luna
text, image
seed-2.0-mini
text
Vision
gpt-5.6-lunaBetter fit
Supported
seed-2.0-mini
Not supported
Reasoning
gpt-5.6-lunaBetter fit
Supported
seed-2.0-mini
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-5.6-luna · leads in 27
79%
Moderate
seed-2.0-mini · leads in 2
21%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads89%seed-2.0-mini14%Logical reasoning
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%seed-2.0-mini8%Mathematics
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads86%seed-2.0-mini12%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads81%seed-2.0-mini11%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%seed-2.0-mini11%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads78%seed-2.0-mini15%Debugging and code review
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%seed-2.0-mini13%Agentic coding
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads82%seed-2.0-mini21%Tool and function calling
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads85%seed-2.0-mini23%SQL and query writing
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads86%seed-2.0-mini16%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads78%seed-2.0-mini12%Professional writing
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads82%seed-2.0-mini15%Conversational quality
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads83%seed-2.0-mini10%Multilingual ability
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads77%seed-2.0-mini16%Translation
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads84%seed-2.0-mini13%Summarization
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads64%seed-2.0-mini19%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads81%seed-2.0-mini16%Professional domains
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads80%seed-2.0-mini12%Information extraction
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads86%seed-2.0-mini24%Classification and labeling
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads95%seed-2.0-mini23%Long-context handling
gpt-5.6-luna32%seed-2.0-miniLeads33%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads81%seed-2.0-mini17%Structured output
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads87%seed-2.0-mini38%Factual accuracy
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads79%seed-2.0-mini16%Safety and alignment
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads72%seed-2.0-mini17%Steerability
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads79%seed-2.0-mini14%Output consistency
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads88%seed-2.0-mini52%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-5.6-luna59%seed-2.0-miniLeads68%Cost efficiency
gpt-5.6-lunaLeads94%seed-2.0-mini48%Image understanding
gpt-5.6-luna53%seed-2.0-miniNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-5.6-luna
82.59%
seed-2.0-mini
100%
Average response time
gpt-5.6-luna
57,896.19 ms
seed-2.0-mini
6,796.87 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-5.6-luna
60,000 ms
seed-2.0-mini
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-luna: 53.1%seed-2.0-mini: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-luna: 99,082 msseed-2.0-mini: 5,772 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-5.6-luna: 60,000 msseed-2.0-mini: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-5.6-luna supports image input while the other model does not.
- seed-2.0-mini recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.