gpt-6-astra
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-6-astravsseed-2.0-mini
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
seed-2.0-mini
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
seed-2.0-mini
250,000 tokens
Input formats
gpt-6-astra
text, image
seed-2.0-mini
text
Vision
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
Supported
seed-2.0-mini
Not supported
Reasoning
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
Supported
seed-2.0-mini
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-6-astra
89.55%
seed-2.0-mini
100%
Average response time
gpt-6-astra
17,174.93 ms
seed-2.0-mini
2,810 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-6-astra
60,000 ms
seed-2.0-mini
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6-astra: 100%seed-2.0-mini: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6-astra: 6,466 msseed-2.0-mini: 3,178 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6-astra: 30,000 msseed-2.0-mini: 10,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-6-astra has a larger context window.
- gpt-6-astra supports image input while the other model does not.