gpt-6-astra
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-6-astravsseed-2.0-mini
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
seed-2.0-mini
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
seed-2.0-mini
250,000 tokens
Input formats
gpt-6-astra
text, image
seed-2.0-mini
text
Vision
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
Supported
seed-2.0-mini
Not supported
Reasoning
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
Supported
seed-2.0-mini
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-6-astra · leads in 27
76%
Moderate
seed-2.0-mini · leads in 2
21%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-6-astraLeads87%seed-2.0-mini14%Logical reasoning
gpt-6-astraLeads81%seed-2.0-mini8%Mathematics
gpt-6-astraLeads83%seed-2.0-mini12%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-6-astraLeads81%seed-2.0-mini11%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-6-astraLeads81%seed-2.0-mini11%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-6-astraLeads75%seed-2.0-mini15%Debugging and code review
gpt-6-astraLeads82%seed-2.0-mini13%Agentic coding
gpt-6-astraLeads83%seed-2.0-mini21%Tool and function calling
gpt-6-astraLeads82%seed-2.0-mini23%SQL and query writing
gpt-6-astraLeads82%seed-2.0-mini16%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-6-astraLeads77%seed-2.0-mini12%Professional writing
gpt-6-astraLeads79%seed-2.0-mini15%Conversational quality
gpt-6-astraLeads80%seed-2.0-mini10%Multilingual ability
gpt-6-astraLeads76%seed-2.0-mini16%Translation
gpt-6-astraLeads81%seed-2.0-mini13%Summarization
gpt-6-astraLeads77%seed-2.0-mini19%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-6-astraLeads84%seed-2.0-mini16%Professional domains
gpt-6-astraLeads81%seed-2.0-mini12%Information extraction
gpt-6-astraLeads82%seed-2.0-mini24%Classification and labeling
gpt-6-astraLeads86%seed-2.0-mini23%Long-context handling
gpt-6-astraLeads84%seed-2.0-mini33%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-6-astraLeads78%seed-2.0-mini17%Structured output
gpt-6-astraLeads84%seed-2.0-mini38%Factual accuracy
gpt-6-astraLeads75%seed-2.0-mini16%Safety and alignment
gpt-6-astraLeads72%seed-2.0-mini17%Steerability
gpt-6-astraLeads77%seed-2.0-mini14%Output consistency
gpt-6-astraLeads80%seed-2.0-mini52%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-6-astra30%seed-2.0-miniLeads68%Cost efficiency
gpt-6-astra28%seed-2.0-miniLeads48%Image understanding
gpt-6-astra61%seed-2.0-miniNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-6-astra
95.42%
seed-2.0-mini
100%
Average response time
gpt-6-astra
14,182.07 ms
seed-2.0-mini
6,796.87 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-6-astra
60,000 ms
seed-2.0-mini
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6-astra: 100%seed-2.0-mini: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6-astra: 4,296 msseed-2.0-mini: 5,772 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6-astra: 10,000 msseed-2.0-mini: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-6-astra has a larger context window.
- gpt-6-astra supports image input while the other model does not.
- seed-2.0-mini recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.