DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Chat comparison
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashvsgpt-6-astra
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-6-astra
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
text
gpt-6-astra
text, image
Vision
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Not supported
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
Supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
96.78%
gpt-6-astra
92.36%
Average response time
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
4,484.83 ms
gpt-6-astra
14,829.48 ms
P95 API latency
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
30,000 ms
gpt-6-astra
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- gpt-6-astra supports image input while the other model does not.
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.