gemma4:31b
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemma4:31bvsminimax-m3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
minimax-m3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gemma4:31b
262,000 tokens
minimax-m3Better fit
512,000 tokens
Reasoning
gemma4:31b
Not supported
minimax-m3Better fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gemma4:31b · leads in 3
34%
Weak
minimax-m3 · leads in 26
47%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gemma4:31b33%minimax-m3Leads35%Logical reasoning
gemma4:31b19%minimax-m3Leads50%Mathematics
gemma4:31b31%minimax-m3Leads51%Scientific and technical depth
gemma4:31b34%minimax-m3Leads42%Planning and task decomposition
gemma4:31b17%minimax-m3Leads52%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gemma4:31b33%minimax-m3Leads37%Debugging and code review
gemma4:31b29%minimax-m3Leads47%Agentic coding
gemma4:31b26%minimax-m3Leads55%Tool and function calling
gemma4:31b29%minimax-m3Leads51%SQL and query writing
gemma4:31b34%minimax-m3Leads48%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gemma4:31b33%minimax-m3Leads38%Professional writing
gemma4:31b31%minimax-m3Leads40%Conversational quality
gemma4:31b23%minimax-m3Leads43%Multilingual ability
gemma4:31b44%minimax-m3Leads65%Translation
gemma4:31b32%minimax-m3Leads50%Summarization
gemma4:31b31%minimax-m3Leads48%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gemma4:31b29%minimax-m3Leads50%Professional domains
gemma4:31b26%minimax-m3Leads43%Information extraction
gemma4:31b35%minimax-m3Leads51%Classification and labeling
gemma4:31b38%minimax-m3Leads51%Long-context handling
gemma4:31b39%minimax-m3Leads59%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gemma4:31b29%minimax-m3Leads46%Structured output
gemma4:31b46%minimax-m3Leads51%Factual accuracy
gemma4:31b34%minimax-m3Leads37%Safety and alignment
gemma4:31b31%minimax-m3Leads35%Steerability
gemma4:31b28%minimax-m3Leads44%Output consistency
gemma4:31bLeads57%minimax-m350%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gemma4:31bLeads48%minimax-m340%Cost efficiency
gemma4:31bLeads59%minimax-m352%Image understanding
gemma4:31bNo image inputminimax-m3No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemma4:31b
99.73%
minimax-m3
99.29%
Average response time
gemma4:31b
6,204.99 ms
minimax-m3
22,425.83 ms
P95 API latency
gemma4:31b
30,000 ms
minimax-m3
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gemma4:31b: 100%minimax-m3: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemma4:31b: 6,773 msminimax-m3: 27,175 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemma4:31b: 30,000 msminimax-m3: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- minimax-m3 has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- gemma4:31b recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.