gemma4:31b
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemma4:31bvskimi-k2.7-code
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k2.7-code
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gemma4:31bBetter fit
262,000 tokens
kimi-k2.7-code
256,000 tokens
Reasoning
gemma4:31b
Not supported
kimi-k2.7-codeBetter fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gemma4:31b · leads in 3
34%
Weak
kimi-k2.7-code · leads in 26
53%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gemma4:31b33%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads37%Logical reasoning
gemma4:31b19%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads59%Mathematics
gemma4:31b31%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads68%Scientific and technical depth
gemma4:31b34%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads56%Planning and task decomposition
gemma4:31b17%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads62%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gemma4:31b33%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads87%Debugging and code review
gemma4:31b29%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads88%Agentic coding
gemma4:31b26%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads81%Tool and function calling
gemma4:31b29%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads58%SQL and query writing
gemma4:31b34%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads84%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gemma4:31b33%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads36%Professional writing
gemma4:31b31%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads39%Conversational quality
gemma4:31b23%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads41%Multilingual ability
gemma4:31b44%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads55%Translation
gemma4:31b32%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads48%Summarization
gemma4:31b31%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads48%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gemma4:31b29%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads59%Professional domains
gemma4:31b26%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads43%Information extraction
gemma4:31b35%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads52%Classification and labeling
gemma4:31b38%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads44%Long-context handling
gemma4:31b39%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads52%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gemma4:31b29%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads50%Structured output
gemma4:31b46%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads59%Factual accuracy
gemma4:31b34%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads44%Safety and alignment
gemma4:31b31%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads39%Steerability
gemma4:31b28%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads45%Output consistency
gemma4:31bLeads57%kimi-k2.7-code53%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gemma4:31bLeads48%kimi-k2.7-code30%Cost efficiency
gemma4:31bLeads59%kimi-k2.7-code34%Image understanding
gemma4:31bNo image inputkimi-k2.7-codeNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemma4:31b
99.73%
kimi-k2.7-code
99.83%
Average response time
gemma4:31b
6,204.99 ms
kimi-k2.7-code
6,571.81 ms
P95 API latency
gemma4:31b
30,000 ms
kimi-k2.7-code
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gemma4:31b: 100%kimi-k2.7-code: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemma4:31b: 6,773 mskimi-k2.7-code: 1,138 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemma4:31b: 30,000 mskimi-k2.7-code: 2,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gemma4:31b has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.