gpt-6.1-sol
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-6.1-solvskimi-k2.7-code
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k2.7-code
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gpt-6.1-solBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
kimi-k2.7-code
256,000 tokens
Input formats
gpt-6.1-sol
text, image, json
kimi-k2.7-code
text
Vision
gpt-6.1-solBetter fit
Supported
kimi-k2.7-code
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-6.1-sol · leads in 28
86%
Strong
kimi-k2.7-code · leads in 1
53%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-6.1-solLeads96%kimi-k2.7-code37%Logical reasoning
gpt-6.1-solLeads89%kimi-k2.7-code59%Mathematics
gpt-6.1-solLeads95%kimi-k2.7-code68%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-6.1-solLeads90%kimi-k2.7-code56%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-6.1-solLeads88%kimi-k2.7-code62%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-6.1-sol86%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads87%Debugging and code review
gpt-6.1-solLeads92%kimi-k2.7-code88%Agentic coding
gpt-6.1-solLeads93%kimi-k2.7-code81%Tool and function calling
gpt-6.1-solLeads90%kimi-k2.7-code58%SQL and query writing
gpt-6.1-solLeads94%kimi-k2.7-code84%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-6.1-solLeads82%kimi-k2.7-code36%Professional writing
gpt-6.1-solLeads87%kimi-k2.7-code39%Conversational quality
gpt-6.1-solLeads88%kimi-k2.7-code41%Multilingual ability
gpt-6.1-solLeads86%kimi-k2.7-code55%Translation
gpt-6.1-solLeads92%kimi-k2.7-code48%Summarization
gpt-6.1-solLeads87%kimi-k2.7-code48%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-6.1-solLeads95%kimi-k2.7-code59%Professional domains
gpt-6.1-solLeads89%kimi-k2.7-code43%Information extraction
gpt-6.1-solLeads96%kimi-k2.7-code52%Classification and labeling
gpt-6.1-solLeads100%kimi-k2.7-code44%Long-context handling
gpt-6.1-solLeads89%kimi-k2.7-code52%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-6.1-solLeads88%kimi-k2.7-code50%Structured output
gpt-6.1-solLeads99%kimi-k2.7-code59%Factual accuracy
gpt-6.1-solLeads86%kimi-k2.7-code44%Safety and alignment
gpt-6.1-solLeads79%kimi-k2.7-code39%Steerability
gpt-6.1-solLeads84%kimi-k2.7-code45%Output consistency
gpt-6.1-solLeads97%kimi-k2.7-code53%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-6.1-solLeads40%kimi-k2.7-code30%Cost efficiency
gpt-6.1-solLeads49%kimi-k2.7-code34%Image understanding
gpt-6.1-sol68%kimi-k2.7-codeNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-6.1-sol
98.17%
kimi-k2.7-code
99.83%
Average response time
gpt-6.1-sol
18,340.6 ms
kimi-k2.7-code
6,571.81 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-6.1-sol
60,000 ms
kimi-k2.7-code
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6.1-sol: 91.7%kimi-k2.7-code: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6.1-sol: 24,176 mskimi-k2.7-code: 1,138 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6.1-sol: 60,000 mskimi-k2.7-code: 2,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-6.1-sol has a larger context window.
- gpt-6.1-sol supports image input while the other model does not.
- kimi-k2.7-code recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- kimi-k2.7-code recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.