gemma4:31b
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemma4:31bvsgpt-6-astra
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-6-astra
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gemma4:31b
262,000 tokens
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
Input formats
gemma4:31b
text
gpt-6-astra
text, image
Vision
gemma4:31b
Not supported
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
Supported
Reasoning
gemma4:31b
Not supported
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gemma4:31b · leads in 2
34%
Weak
gpt-6-astra · leads in 27
76%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gemma4:31b33%gpt-6-astraLeads87%Logical reasoning
gemma4:31b19%gpt-6-astraLeads81%Mathematics
gemma4:31b31%gpt-6-astraLeads83%Scientific and technical depth
gemma4:31b34%gpt-6-astraLeads81%Planning and task decomposition
gemma4:31b17%gpt-6-astraLeads81%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gemma4:31b33%gpt-6-astraLeads75%Debugging and code review
gemma4:31b29%gpt-6-astraLeads82%Agentic coding
gemma4:31b26%gpt-6-astraLeads83%Tool and function calling
gemma4:31b29%gpt-6-astraLeads82%SQL and query writing
gemma4:31b34%gpt-6-astraLeads82%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gemma4:31b33%gpt-6-astraLeads77%Professional writing
gemma4:31b31%gpt-6-astraLeads79%Conversational quality
gemma4:31b23%gpt-6-astraLeads80%Multilingual ability
gemma4:31b44%gpt-6-astraLeads76%Translation
gemma4:31b32%gpt-6-astraLeads81%Summarization
gemma4:31b31%gpt-6-astraLeads77%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gemma4:31b29%gpt-6-astraLeads84%Professional domains
gemma4:31b26%gpt-6-astraLeads81%Information extraction
gemma4:31b35%gpt-6-astraLeads82%Classification and labeling
gemma4:31b38%gpt-6-astraLeads86%Long-context handling
gemma4:31b39%gpt-6-astraLeads84%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gemma4:31b29%gpt-6-astraLeads78%Structured output
gemma4:31b46%gpt-6-astraLeads84%Factual accuracy
gemma4:31b34%gpt-6-astraLeads75%Safety and alignment
gemma4:31b31%gpt-6-astraLeads72%Steerability
gemma4:31b28%gpt-6-astraLeads77%Output consistency
gemma4:31b57%gpt-6-astraLeads80%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gemma4:31bLeads48%gpt-6-astra30%Cost efficiency
gemma4:31bLeads59%gpt-6-astra28%Image understanding
gemma4:31bNo image inputgpt-6-astra61%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemma4:31b
99.73%
gpt-6-astra
95.42%
Average response time
gemma4:31b
6,204.99 ms
gpt-6-astra
14,182.07 ms
P95 API latency
gemma4:31b
30,000 ms
gpt-6-astra
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gemma4:31b: 100%gpt-6-astra: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemma4:31b: 6,773 msgpt-6-astra: 4,296 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemma4:31b: 30,000 msgpt-6-astra: 10,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-6-astra has a larger context window.
- gpt-6-astra supports image input while the other model does not.
- gemma4:31b recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- gemma4:31b recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.