gemma4:31b
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemma4:31bvsgpt-oss:20b
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-oss:20b
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gemma4:31bBetter fit
262,000 tokens
gpt-oss:20b
128,000 tokens
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gemma4:31b · leads in 24
34%
Weak
gpt-oss:20b · leads in 3
30%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gemma4:31bLeads33%gpt-oss:20b26%Logical reasoning
gemma4:31bLeads19%gpt-oss:20b14%Mathematics
gemma4:31bLeads31%gpt-oss:20b23%Scientific and technical depth
gemma4:31bLeads34%gpt-oss:20b24%Planning and task decomposition
gemma4:31bLeads17%gpt-oss:20b15%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gemma4:31bLeads33%gpt-oss:20b32%Debugging and code review
gemma4:31bLeads29%gpt-oss:20b26%Agentic coding
gemma4:31b26%gpt-oss:20b26%Tool and function calling
gemma4:31b29%gpt-oss:20bLeads30%SQL and query writing
gemma4:31bLeads34%gpt-oss:20b27%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gemma4:31bLeads33%gpt-oss:20b26%Professional writing
gemma4:31bLeads31%gpt-oss:20b24%Conversational quality
gemma4:31bLeads23%gpt-oss:20b21%Multilingual ability
gemma4:31bLeads44%gpt-oss:20b28%Translation
gemma4:31bLeads32%gpt-oss:20b25%Summarization
gemma4:31bLeads31%gpt-oss:20b21%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gemma4:31bLeads29%gpt-oss:20b22%Professional domains
gemma4:31bLeads26%gpt-oss:20b19%Information extraction
gemma4:31bLeads35%gpt-oss:20b30%Classification and labeling
gemma4:31bLeads38%gpt-oss:20b31%Long-context handling
gemma4:31bLeads39%gpt-oss:20b26%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gemma4:31bLeads29%gpt-oss:20b23%Structured output
gemma4:31b46%gpt-oss:20b46%Factual accuracy
gemma4:31bLeads34%gpt-oss:20b25%Safety and alignment
gemma4:31bLeads31%gpt-oss:20b24%Steerability
gemma4:31bLeads28%gpt-oss:20b23%Output consistency
gemma4:31bLeads57%gpt-oss:20b51%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gemma4:31b48%gpt-oss:20bLeads69%Cost efficiency
gemma4:31b59%gpt-oss:20bLeads80%Image understanding
gemma4:31bNo image inputgpt-oss:20bNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemma4:31b
99.73%
gpt-oss:20b
99.11%
Average response time
gemma4:31b
6,204.99 ms
gpt-oss:20b
2,686.07 ms
P95 API latency
gemma4:31b
30,000 ms
gpt-oss:20b
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gemma4:31b: 100%gpt-oss:20b: 99.3%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemma4:31b: 6,773 msgpt-oss:20b: 2,509 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemma4:31b: 30,000 msgpt-oss:20b: 10,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gemma4:31b has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- gpt-oss:20b recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.