gemini-3-flash
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemini-3-flashvsglm-5.2
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
glm-5.2
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gemini-3-flashBetter fit
1,048,576 tokens
glm-5.2
976,000 tokens
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gemini-3-flash · leads in 29
71%
Moderate
glm-5.2 · leads in 0
56%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gemini-3-flashLeads67%glm-5.250%Logical reasoning
gemini-3-flashLeads64%glm-5.257%Mathematics
gemini-3-flashLeads66%glm-5.262%Scientific and technical depth
gemini-3-flashLeads63%glm-5.256%Planning and task decomposition
gemini-3-flashLeads63%glm-5.257%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gemini-3-flashLeads59%glm-5.247%Debugging and code review
gemini-3-flashLeads65%glm-5.258%Agentic coding
gemini-3-flashLeads72%glm-5.261%Tool and function calling
gemini-3-flashLeads69%glm-5.255%SQL and query writing
gemini-3-flashLeads70%glm-5.263%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gemini-3-flashLeads53%glm-5.244%Professional writing
gemini-3-flashLeads60%glm-5.251%Conversational quality
gemini-3-flashLeads60%glm-5.249%Multilingual ability
gemini-3-flashLeads94%glm-5.284%Translation
gemini-3-flashLeads74%glm-5.261%Summarization
gemini-3-flashLeads72%glm-5.257%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gemini-3-flashLeads75%glm-5.261%Professional domains
gemini-3-flashLeads61%glm-5.253%Information extraction
gemini-3-flashLeads76%glm-5.261%Classification and labeling
gemini-3-flashLeads82%glm-5.261%Long-context handling
gemini-3-flashLeads97%glm-5.267%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gemini-3-flashLeads63%glm-5.253%Structured output
gemini-3-flashLeads77%glm-5.260%Factual accuracy
gemini-3-flashLeads69%glm-5.250%Safety and alignment
gemini-3-flashLeads64%glm-5.245%Steerability
gemini-3-flashLeads56%glm-5.249%Output consistency
gemini-3-flashLeads74%glm-5.260%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gemini-3-flashLeads93%glm-5.237%Cost efficiency
gemini-3-flashLeads88%glm-5.243%Image understanding
gemini-3-flashNo image inputglm-5.2No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemini-3-flash
87.03%
glm-5.2
99.94%
Average response time
gemini-3-flash
5,576.7 ms
glm-5.2
2,766.68 ms
P95 API latency
gemini-3-flash
30,000 ms
glm-5.2
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3-flash: 99.7%glm-5.2: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3-flash: 5,803 msglm-5.2: 666 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3-flash: 30,000 msglm-5.2: 5,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gemini-3-flash has a larger context window.
- glm-5.2 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- glm-5.2 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.