minimax-m3
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
minimax-m3vsseed-2.0-mini
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
seed-2.0-mini
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
minimax-m3Better fit
512,000 tokens
seed-2.0-mini
250,000 tokens
Reasoning
minimax-m3Better fit
Supported
seed-2.0-mini
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
minimax-m3 · leads in 27
47%
Weak
seed-2.0-mini · leads in 2
21%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
minimax-m3Leads35%seed-2.0-mini14%Logical reasoning
minimax-m3Leads50%seed-2.0-mini8%Mathematics
minimax-m3Leads51%seed-2.0-mini12%Scientific and technical depth
minimax-m3Leads42%seed-2.0-mini11%Planning and task decomposition
minimax-m3Leads52%seed-2.0-mini11%
Coding & tools
Code generation
minimax-m3Leads37%seed-2.0-mini15%Debugging and code review
minimax-m3Leads47%seed-2.0-mini13%Agentic coding
minimax-m3Leads55%seed-2.0-mini21%Tool and function calling
minimax-m3Leads51%seed-2.0-mini23%SQL and query writing
minimax-m3Leads48%seed-2.0-mini16%
Writing & language
Creative writing
minimax-m3Leads38%seed-2.0-mini12%Professional writing
minimax-m3Leads40%seed-2.0-mini15%Conversational quality
minimax-m3Leads43%seed-2.0-mini10%Multilingual ability
minimax-m3Leads65%seed-2.0-mini16%Translation
minimax-m3Leads50%seed-2.0-mini13%Summarization
minimax-m3Leads48%seed-2.0-mini19%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
minimax-m3Leads50%seed-2.0-mini16%Professional domains
minimax-m3Leads43%seed-2.0-mini12%Information extraction
minimax-m3Leads51%seed-2.0-mini24%Classification and labeling
minimax-m3Leads51%seed-2.0-mini23%Long-context handling
minimax-m3Leads59%seed-2.0-mini33%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
minimax-m3Leads46%seed-2.0-mini17%Structured output
minimax-m3Leads51%seed-2.0-mini38%Factual accuracy
minimax-m3Leads37%seed-2.0-mini16%Safety and alignment
minimax-m3Leads35%seed-2.0-mini17%Steerability
minimax-m3Leads44%seed-2.0-mini14%Output consistency
minimax-m350%seed-2.0-miniLeads52%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
minimax-m340%seed-2.0-miniLeads68%Cost efficiency
minimax-m3Leads52%seed-2.0-mini48%Image understanding
minimax-m3No image inputseed-2.0-miniNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
minimax-m3
99.29%
seed-2.0-mini
100%
Average response time
minimax-m3
22,425.83 ms
seed-2.0-mini
6,796.87 ms
P95 API latency
minimax-m3
60,000 ms
seed-2.0-mini
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
minimax-m3: 100%seed-2.0-mini: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
minimax-m3: 27,175 msseed-2.0-mini: 5,772 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
minimax-m3: 60,000 msseed-2.0-mini: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- minimax-m3 has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.