LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Google logo

gemini-3.1-provsmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

Mistral AI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

gemini-3.1-pro

Checking current pricing…

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Tool calling

gemini-3.1-proBetter fit

Supported

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

Not supported

Reasoning

gemini-3.1-proBetter fit

Supported

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

gemini-3.1-pro · leads in 27

69%

Moderate

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 · leads in 2

34%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    gemini-3.1-proLeads73%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240724%
  • Logical reasoning

    gemini-3.1-proLeads69%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240715%
  • Mathematics

    gemini-3.1-proLeads76%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240727%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    gemini-3.1-proLeads76%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240723%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    gemini-3.1-proLeads67%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240711%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    gemini-3.1-proLeads64%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240735%
  • Debugging and code review

    gemini-3.1-proLeads69%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240724%
  • Agentic coding

    gemini-3.1-proLeads69%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-24078%
  • Tool and function calling

    gemini-3.1-proLeads73%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-24077%
  • SQL and query writing

    gemini-3.1-proLeads73%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240735%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    gemini-3.1-proLeads61%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240728%
  • Professional writing

    gemini-3.1-proLeads67%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240730%
  • Conversational quality

    gemini-3.1-proLeads67%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240730%
  • Multilingual ability

    gemini-3.1-proLeads98%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240765%
  • Translation

    gemini-3.1-proLeads78%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240732%
  • Summarization

    gemini-3.1-proLeads55%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240725%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    gemini-3.1-proLeads75%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240721%
  • Professional domains

    gemini-3.1-proLeads70%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240718%
  • Information extraction

    gemini-3.1-proLeads72%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240735%
  • Classification and labeling

    gemini-3.1-proLeads79%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240737%
  • Long-context handling

    gemini-3.1-proLeads40%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240729%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    gemini-3.1-proLeads67%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240745%
  • Structured output

    gemini-3.1-proLeads77%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240751%
  • Factual accuracy

    gemini-3.1-proLeads75%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240737%
  • Safety and alignment

    gemini-3.1-proLeads69%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240733%
  • Steerability

    gemini-3.1-proLeads62%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240739%
  • Output consistency

    gemini-3.1-proLeads76%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240771%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    gemini-3.1-pro47%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads76%
  • Cost efficiency

    gemini-3.1-pro54%
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads84%
  • Image understanding

    gemini-3.1-proNo image input
    mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407No image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

gemini-3.1-pro

89.68%

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

99.4%

Average response time

gemini-3.1-pro

39,780.78 ms

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

5,547.3 ms

P95 API latency

gemini-3.1-pro

60,000 ms

mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407

30,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.1-pro: 85.7%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 97.1%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.1-pro: 43,687 msmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 2,920 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.1-pro: 60,000 msmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 30,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring