glm-5.2
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
glm-5.2vsmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
glm-5.2Better fit
976,000 tokens
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
128,000 tokens
Tool calling
glm-5.2Better fit
Supported
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Not supported
Reasoning
glm-5.2Better fit
Supported
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
glm-5.2 · leads in 26
56%
Moderate
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 · leads in 3
34%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
glm-5.2Leads50%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240724%Logical reasoning
glm-5.2Leads57%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240715%Mathematics
glm-5.2Leads62%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240727%Scientific and technical depth
glm-5.2Leads56%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240723%Planning and task decomposition
glm-5.2Leads57%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240711%
Coding & tools
Code generation
glm-5.2Leads47%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240735%Debugging and code review
glm-5.2Leads58%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240724%Agentic coding
glm-5.2Leads61%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-24078%Tool and function calling
glm-5.2Leads55%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-24077%SQL and query writing
glm-5.2Leads63%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240735%
Writing & language
Creative writing
glm-5.2Leads44%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240728%Professional writing
glm-5.2Leads51%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240730%Conversational quality
glm-5.2Leads49%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240730%Multilingual ability
glm-5.2Leads84%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240765%Translation
glm-5.2Leads61%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240732%Summarization
glm-5.2Leads57%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240725%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
glm-5.2Leads61%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240721%Professional domains
glm-5.2Leads53%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240718%Information extraction
glm-5.2Leads61%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240735%Classification and labeling
glm-5.2Leads61%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240737%Long-context handling
glm-5.2Leads67%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240729%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
glm-5.2Leads53%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240745%Structured output
glm-5.2Leads60%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240751%Factual accuracy
glm-5.2Leads50%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240737%Safety and alignment
glm-5.2Leads45%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240733%Steerability
glm-5.2Leads49%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-240739%Output consistency
glm-5.260%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads71%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
glm-5.237%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads76%Cost efficiency
glm-5.243%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407Leads84%Image understanding
glm-5.2No image inputmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
glm-5.2
99.94%
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
99.4%
Average response time
glm-5.2
2,766.68 ms
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
5,547.3 ms
P95 API latency
glm-5.2
10,000 ms
mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 100%mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 97.1%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 666 msmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 2,920 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 5,000 msmistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407: 30,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- glm-5.2 has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- glm-5.2 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.