gemini-3.1-pro
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemini-3.1-provsminimax-m3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
minimax-m3
Checking current pricing…
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gemini-3.1-pro · leads in 28
69%
Moderate
minimax-m3 · leads in 1
47%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%minimax-m335%Logical reasoning
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%minimax-m350%Mathematics
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%minimax-m351%Scientific and technical depth
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%minimax-m342%Planning and task decomposition
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%minimax-m352%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gemini-3.1-proLeads64%minimax-m337%Debugging and code review
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%minimax-m347%Agentic coding
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%minimax-m355%Tool and function calling
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%minimax-m351%SQL and query writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%minimax-m348%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads61%minimax-m338%Professional writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%minimax-m340%Conversational quality
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%minimax-m343%Multilingual ability
gemini-3.1-proLeads98%minimax-m365%Translation
gemini-3.1-proLeads78%minimax-m350%Summarization
gemini-3.1-proLeads55%minimax-m348%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%minimax-m350%Professional domains
gemini-3.1-proLeads70%minimax-m343%Information extraction
gemini-3.1-proLeads72%minimax-m351%Classification and labeling
gemini-3.1-proLeads79%minimax-m351%Long-context handling
gemini-3.1-pro40%minimax-m3Leads59%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%minimax-m346%Structured output
gemini-3.1-proLeads77%minimax-m351%Factual accuracy
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%minimax-m337%Safety and alignment
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%minimax-m335%Steerability
gemini-3.1-proLeads62%minimax-m344%Output consistency
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%minimax-m350%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gemini-3.1-proLeads47%minimax-m340%Cost efficiency
gemini-3.1-proLeads54%minimax-m352%Image understanding
gemini-3.1-proNo image inputminimax-m3No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemini-3.1-pro
89.68%
minimax-m3
99.29%
Average response time
gemini-3.1-pro
39,780.78 ms
minimax-m3
22,425.83 ms
P95 API latency
gemini-3.1-pro
60,000 ms
minimax-m3
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 85.7%minimax-m3: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 43,687 msminimax-m3: 27,175 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 60,000 msminimax-m3: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- minimax-m3 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.