gemini-3.1-pro
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemini-3.1-provsgemma4:31b
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gemma4:31b
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Reasoning
gemini-3.1-proBetter fit
Supported
gemma4:31b
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gemini-3.1-pro · leads in 27
69%
Moderate
gemma4:31b · leads in 2
34%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%gemma4:31b33%Logical reasoning
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%gemma4:31b19%Mathematics
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%gemma4:31b31%Scientific and technical depth
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%gemma4:31b34%Planning and task decomposition
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%gemma4:31b17%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gemini-3.1-proLeads64%gemma4:31b33%Debugging and code review
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%gemma4:31b29%Agentic coding
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%gemma4:31b26%Tool and function calling
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%gemma4:31b29%SQL and query writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%gemma4:31b34%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads61%gemma4:31b33%Professional writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%gemma4:31b31%Conversational quality
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%gemma4:31b23%Multilingual ability
gemini-3.1-proLeads98%gemma4:31b44%Translation
gemini-3.1-proLeads78%gemma4:31b32%Summarization
gemini-3.1-proLeads55%gemma4:31b31%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%gemma4:31b29%Professional domains
gemini-3.1-proLeads70%gemma4:31b26%Information extraction
gemini-3.1-proLeads72%gemma4:31b35%Classification and labeling
gemini-3.1-proLeads79%gemma4:31b38%Long-context handling
gemini-3.1-proLeads40%gemma4:31b39%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%gemma4:31b29%Structured output
gemini-3.1-proLeads77%gemma4:31b46%Factual accuracy
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%gemma4:31b34%Safety and alignment
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%gemma4:31b31%Steerability
gemini-3.1-proLeads62%gemma4:31b28%Output consistency
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%gemma4:31b57%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gemini-3.1-pro47%gemma4:31bLeads48%Cost efficiency
gemini-3.1-pro54%gemma4:31bLeads59%Image understanding
gemini-3.1-proNo image inputgemma4:31bNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemini-3.1-pro
89.68%
gemma4:31b
99.73%
Average response time
gemini-3.1-pro
39,780.78 ms
gemma4:31b
6,204.99 ms
P95 API latency
gemini-3.1-pro
60,000 ms
gemma4:31b
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 85.7%gemma4:31b: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 43,687 msgemma4:31b: 6,773 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 60,000 msgemma4:31b: 30,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gemma4:31b recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- gemma4:31b recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.