gemini-3.1-pro
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemini-3.1-provsgpt-6-luna
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-6-luna
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Reasoning
gemini-3.1-proBetter fit
Supported
gpt-6-luna
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gemini-3.1-pro · leads in 26
69%
Moderate
gpt-6-luna · leads in 3
52%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%gpt-6-luna72%Logical reasoning
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%gpt-6-luna28%Mathematics
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%gpt-6-luna42%Scientific and technical depth
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%gpt-6-luna46%Planning and task decomposition
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%gpt-6-luna29%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gemini-3.1-proLeads64%gpt-6-luna49%Debugging and code review
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%gpt-6-luna39%Agentic coding
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%gpt-6-luna35%Tool and function calling
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%gpt-6-luna52%SQL and query writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%gpt-6-luna48%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads61%gpt-6-luna54%Professional writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%gpt-6-luna59%Conversational quality
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%gpt-6-luna54%Multilingual ability
gemini-3.1-proLeads98%gpt-6-luna61%Translation
gemini-3.1-proLeads78%gpt-6-luna57%Summarization
gemini-3.1-proLeads55%gpt-6-luna37%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%gpt-6-luna39%Professional domains
gemini-3.1-proLeads70%gpt-6-luna49%Information extraction
gemini-3.1-proLeads72%gpt-6-luna57%Classification and labeling
gemini-3.1-proLeads79%gpt-6-luna62%Long-context handling
gemini-3.1-proLeads40%gpt-6-luna22%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%gpt-6-luna55%Structured output
gemini-3.1-proLeads77%gpt-6-luna70%Factual accuracy
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%gpt-6-luna59%Safety and alignment
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%gpt-6-luna59%Steerability
gemini-3.1-proLeads62%gpt-6-luna53%Output consistency
gemini-3.1-pro76%gpt-6-lunaLeads80%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gemini-3.1-pro47%gpt-6-lunaLeads59%Cost efficiency
gemini-3.1-pro54%gpt-6-lunaLeads71%Image understanding
gemini-3.1-proNo image inputgpt-6-lunaNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemini-3.1-pro
89.68%
gpt-6-luna
92.86%
Average response time
gemini-3.1-pro
39,780.78 ms
gpt-6-luna
47,470.23 ms
P95 API latency
gemini-3.1-pro
60,000 ms
gpt-6-luna
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 85.7%gpt-6-luna: 92.6%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 43,687 msgpt-6-luna: 48,342 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 60,000 msgpt-6-luna: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-6-luna recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.