claude-fable-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-fable-5vsgemini-3.1-pro
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gemini-3.1-pro
Checking current pricing…
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-fable-5 · leads in 26
91%
Strong
gemini-3.1-pro · leads in 3
69%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-fable-5Leads98%gemini-3.1-pro73%Logical reasoning
claude-fable-5Leads99%gemini-3.1-pro69%Mathematics
claude-fable-5Leads98%gemini-3.1-pro76%Scientific and technical depth
claude-fable-5Leads99%gemini-3.1-pro76%Planning and task decomposition
claude-fable-5Leads99%gemini-3.1-pro67%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-fable-5Leads88%gemini-3.1-pro64%Debugging and code review
claude-fable-5Leads97%gemini-3.1-pro69%Agentic coding
claude-fable-5Leads98%gemini-3.1-pro69%Tool and function calling
claude-fable-5Leads98%gemini-3.1-pro73%SQL and query writing
claude-fable-5Leads98%gemini-3.1-pro73%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-fable-5Leads98%gemini-3.1-pro61%Professional writing
claude-fable-5Leads99%gemini-3.1-pro67%Conversational quality
claude-fable-5Leads98%gemini-3.1-pro67%Multilingual ability
claude-fable-582%gemini-3.1-proLeads98%Translation
claude-fable-5Leads97%gemini-3.1-pro78%Summarization
claude-fable-5Leads98%gemini-3.1-pro55%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-fable-5Leads96%gemini-3.1-pro75%Professional domains
claude-fable-5Leads98%gemini-3.1-pro70%Information extraction
claude-fable-5Leads97%gemini-3.1-pro72%Classification and labeling
claude-fable-5Leads97%gemini-3.1-pro79%Long-context handling
claude-fable-5Leads99%gemini-3.1-pro40%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-fable-5Leads99%gemini-3.1-pro67%Structured output
claude-fable-5Leads98%gemini-3.1-pro77%Factual accuracy
claude-fable-5Leads99%gemini-3.1-pro75%Safety and alignment
claude-fable-5Leads99%gemini-3.1-pro69%Steerability
claude-fable-5Leads99%gemini-3.1-pro62%Output consistency
claude-fable-5Leads84%gemini-3.1-pro76%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-fable-511%gemini-3.1-proLeads47%Cost efficiency
claude-fable-515%gemini-3.1-proLeads54%Image understanding
claude-fable-5No image inputgemini-3.1-proNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-fable-5
99.32%
gemini-3.1-pro
89.68%
Average response time
claude-fable-5
8,411.23 ms
gemini-3.1-pro
39,780.78 ms
P95 API latency
claude-fable-5
30,000 ms
gemini-3.1-pro
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5: 100%gemini-3.1-pro: 85.7%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5: 10,131 msgemini-3.1-pro: 43,687 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5: 30,000 msgemini-3.1-pro: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- claude-fable-5 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- claude-fable-5 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.