gemini-3.1-pro
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemini-3.1-provsglm-5.2
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
glm-5.2
Checking current pricing…
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gemini-3.1-pro · leads in 27
69%
Moderate
glm-5.2 · leads in 2
56%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%glm-5.250%Logical reasoning
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%glm-5.257%Mathematics
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%glm-5.262%Scientific and technical depth
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%glm-5.256%Planning and task decomposition
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%glm-5.257%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gemini-3.1-proLeads64%glm-5.247%Debugging and code review
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%glm-5.258%Agentic coding
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%glm-5.261%Tool and function calling
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%glm-5.255%SQL and query writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%glm-5.263%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads61%glm-5.244%Professional writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%glm-5.251%Conversational quality
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%glm-5.249%Multilingual ability
gemini-3.1-proLeads98%glm-5.284%Translation
gemini-3.1-proLeads78%glm-5.261%Summarization
gemini-3.1-pro55%glm-5.2Leads57%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%glm-5.261%Professional domains
gemini-3.1-proLeads70%glm-5.253%Information extraction
gemini-3.1-proLeads72%glm-5.261%Classification and labeling
gemini-3.1-proLeads79%glm-5.261%Long-context handling
gemini-3.1-pro40%glm-5.2Leads67%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%glm-5.253%Structured output
gemini-3.1-proLeads77%glm-5.260%Factual accuracy
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%glm-5.250%Safety and alignment
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%glm-5.245%Steerability
gemini-3.1-proLeads62%glm-5.249%Output consistency
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%glm-5.260%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gemini-3.1-proLeads47%glm-5.237%Cost efficiency
gemini-3.1-proLeads54%glm-5.243%Image understanding
gemini-3.1-proNo image inputglm-5.2No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemini-3.1-pro
89.68%
glm-5.2
99.94%
Average response time
gemini-3.1-pro
39,780.78 ms
glm-5.2
2,766.68 ms
P95 API latency
gemini-3.1-pro
60,000 ms
glm-5.2
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 85.7%glm-5.2: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 43,687 msglm-5.2: 666 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 60,000 msglm-5.2: 5,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- glm-5.2 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- glm-5.2 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.