gemini-3.1-pro
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemini-3.1-provskimi-k2.7-code
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k2.7-code
Checking current pricing…
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gemini-3.1-pro · leads in 24
69%
Moderate
kimi-k2.7-code · leads in 5
53%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%kimi-k2.7-code37%Logical reasoning
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%kimi-k2.7-code59%Mathematics
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%kimi-k2.7-code68%Scientific and technical depth
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%kimi-k2.7-code56%Planning and task decomposition
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%kimi-k2.7-code62%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gemini-3.1-pro64%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads87%Debugging and code review
gemini-3.1-pro69%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads88%Agentic coding
gemini-3.1-pro69%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads81%Tool and function calling
gemini-3.1-proLeads73%kimi-k2.7-code58%SQL and query writing
gemini-3.1-pro73%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads84%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads61%kimi-k2.7-code36%Professional writing
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%kimi-k2.7-code39%Conversational quality
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%kimi-k2.7-code41%Multilingual ability
gemini-3.1-proLeads98%kimi-k2.7-code55%Translation
gemini-3.1-proLeads78%kimi-k2.7-code48%Summarization
gemini-3.1-proLeads55%kimi-k2.7-code48%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%kimi-k2.7-code59%Professional domains
gemini-3.1-proLeads70%kimi-k2.7-code43%Information extraction
gemini-3.1-proLeads72%kimi-k2.7-code52%Classification and labeling
gemini-3.1-proLeads79%kimi-k2.7-code44%Long-context handling
gemini-3.1-pro40%kimi-k2.7-codeLeads52%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gemini-3.1-proLeads67%kimi-k2.7-code50%Structured output
gemini-3.1-proLeads77%kimi-k2.7-code59%Factual accuracy
gemini-3.1-proLeads75%kimi-k2.7-code44%Safety and alignment
gemini-3.1-proLeads69%kimi-k2.7-code39%Steerability
gemini-3.1-proLeads62%kimi-k2.7-code45%Output consistency
gemini-3.1-proLeads76%kimi-k2.7-code53%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gemini-3.1-proLeads47%kimi-k2.7-code30%Cost efficiency
gemini-3.1-proLeads54%kimi-k2.7-code34%Image understanding
gemini-3.1-proNo image inputkimi-k2.7-codeNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemini-3.1-pro
89.68%
kimi-k2.7-code
99.83%
Average response time
gemini-3.1-pro
39,780.78 ms
kimi-k2.7-code
6,571.81 ms
P95 API latency
gemini-3.1-pro
60,000 ms
kimi-k2.7-code
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 85.7%kimi-k2.7-code: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 43,687 mskimi-k2.7-code: 1,138 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gemini-3.1-pro: 60,000 mskimi-k2.7-code: 2,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- kimi-k2.7-code recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- kimi-k2.7-code recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.