LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

DeepSeek logo

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashvsgpt-5.6-luna

OpenAI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

text

gpt-5.6-luna

text, image

Vision

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Not supported

gpt-5.6-lunaBetter fit

Supported

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

96.78%

gpt-5.6-luna

84.05%

Average response time

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

4,484.83 ms

gpt-5.6-luna

56,301.41 ms

P95 API latency

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

30,000 ms

gpt-5.6-luna

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 98.4%gpt-5.6-luna: 98.3%
13 Sept30 Sept

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 8,962 msgpt-5.6-luna: 27,997 ms
13 Sept30 Sept

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 30,000 msgpt-5.6-luna: 60,000 ms
13 Sept30 Sept

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • gpt-5.6-luna supports image input while the other model does not.
  • DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring