LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Mistral AI logo

codestral-latestvsgpt-6.1-sol

OpenAI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

codestral-latest

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

codestral-latest

32,000 tokens

gpt-6.1-solBetter fit

1,000,000 tokens

Input formats

codestral-latest

text

gpt-6.1-sol

text, image, json

Vision

codestral-latest

Not supported

gpt-6.1-solBetter fit

Supported

Reasoning

codestral-latest

Not supported

gpt-6.1-solBetter fit

Supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

codestral-latest · leads in 2

28%

Weak

gpt-6.1-sol · leads in 27

86%

Strong

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    codestral-latest9%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads96%
  • Logical reasoning

    codestral-latest10%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads89%
  • Mathematics

    codestral-latest25%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads95%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    codestral-latest15%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads90%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    codestral-latest11%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads88%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    codestral-latest85%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads86%
  • Debugging and code review

    codestral-latest60%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads92%
  • Agentic coding

    codestral-latest44%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads93%
  • Tool and function calling

    codestral-latest33%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads90%
  • SQL and query writing

    codestral-latest60%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads94%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    codestral-latest7%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads82%
  • Professional writing

    codestral-latest8%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads87%
  • Conversational quality

    codestral-latest7%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads88%
  • Multilingual ability

    codestral-latest32%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads86%
  • Translation

    codestral-latest11%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads92%
  • Summarization

    codestral-latest7%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads87%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    codestral-latest13%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads95%
  • Professional domains

    codestral-latest5%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads89%
  • Information extraction

    codestral-latest16%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads96%
  • Classification and labeling

    codestral-latest15%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads100%
  • Long-context handling

    codestral-latest15%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads89%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    codestral-latest21%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads88%
  • Structured output

    codestral-latest44%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads99%
  • Factual accuracy

    codestral-latest17%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads86%
  • Safety and alignment

    codestral-latest14%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads79%
  • Steerability

    codestral-latest14%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads84%
  • Output consistency

    codestral-latest52%
    gpt-6.1-solLeads97%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    codestral-latestLeads85%
    gpt-6.1-sol40%
  • Cost efficiency

    codestral-latestLeads82%
    gpt-6.1-sol49%
  • Image understanding

    codestral-latestNo image input
    gpt-6.1-sol68%

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

codestral-latest

98.36%

gpt-6.1-sol

98.17%

Average response time

codestral-latest

3,439.06 ms

gpt-6.1-sol

18,340.6 ms

P95 API latency

codestral-latest

10,000 ms

gpt-6.1-sol

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

codestral-latest: 99.3%gpt-6.1-sol: 91.7%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

codestral-latest: 4,108 msgpt-6.1-sol: 24,176 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

codestral-latest: 10,000 msgpt-6.1-sol: 60,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • gpt-6.1-sol has a larger context window.
  • gpt-6.1-sol supports image input while the other model does not.
  • The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
  • codestral-latest recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring