gpt-6.1-sol
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-6.1-solvsgpt-6-luna
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-6-luna
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
gpt-6.1-sol
text, image, json
gpt-6-luna
text
Vision
gpt-6.1-solBetter fit
Supported
gpt-6-luna
Not supported
Reasoning
gpt-6.1-solBetter fit
Supported
gpt-6-luna
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-6.1-sol · leads in 27
86%
Strong
gpt-6-luna · leads in 2
52%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-6.1-solLeads96%gpt-6-luna72%Logical reasoning
gpt-6.1-solLeads89%gpt-6-luna28%Mathematics
gpt-6.1-solLeads95%gpt-6-luna42%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-6.1-solLeads90%gpt-6-luna46%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-6.1-solLeads88%gpt-6-luna29%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-6.1-solLeads86%gpt-6-luna49%Debugging and code review
gpt-6.1-solLeads92%gpt-6-luna39%Agentic coding
gpt-6.1-solLeads93%gpt-6-luna35%Tool and function calling
gpt-6.1-solLeads90%gpt-6-luna52%SQL and query writing
gpt-6.1-solLeads94%gpt-6-luna48%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-6.1-solLeads82%gpt-6-luna54%Professional writing
gpt-6.1-solLeads87%gpt-6-luna59%Conversational quality
gpt-6.1-solLeads88%gpt-6-luna54%Multilingual ability
gpt-6.1-solLeads86%gpt-6-luna61%Translation
gpt-6.1-solLeads92%gpt-6-luna57%Summarization
gpt-6.1-solLeads87%gpt-6-luna37%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-6.1-solLeads95%gpt-6-luna39%Professional domains
gpt-6.1-solLeads89%gpt-6-luna49%Information extraction
gpt-6.1-solLeads96%gpt-6-luna57%Classification and labeling
gpt-6.1-solLeads100%gpt-6-luna62%Long-context handling
gpt-6.1-solLeads89%gpt-6-luna22%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-6.1-solLeads88%gpt-6-luna55%Structured output
gpt-6.1-solLeads99%gpt-6-luna70%Factual accuracy
gpt-6.1-solLeads86%gpt-6-luna59%Safety and alignment
gpt-6.1-solLeads79%gpt-6-luna59%Steerability
gpt-6.1-solLeads84%gpt-6-luna53%Output consistency
gpt-6.1-solLeads97%gpt-6-luna80%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-6.1-sol40%gpt-6-lunaLeads59%Cost efficiency
gpt-6.1-sol49%gpt-6-lunaLeads71%Image understanding
gpt-6.1-sol68%gpt-6-lunaNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-6.1-sol
98.17%
gpt-6-luna
92.86%
Average response time
gpt-6.1-sol
18,340.6 ms
gpt-6-luna
47,470.23 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-6.1-sol
60,000 ms
gpt-6-luna
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6.1-sol: 91.7%gpt-6-luna: 92.6%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6.1-sol: 24,176 msgpt-6-luna: 48,342 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6.1-sol: 60,000 msgpt-6-luna: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-6.1-sol supports image input while the other model does not.
- gpt-6.1-sol recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.