LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6vsgpt-6-luna

OpenAI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

text, image, json

gpt-6-luna

text

Vision

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Better fit

Supported

gpt-6-luna

Not supported

Reasoning

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Better fit

Supported

gpt-6-luna

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 · leads in 27

82%

Strong

gpt-6-luna · leads in 2

52%

Moderate

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads86%
    gpt-6-luna72%

  • Logical reasoning

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads89%
    gpt-6-luna28%

  • Mathematics

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads86%
    gpt-6-luna42%

  • Scientific and technical depth

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads91%
    gpt-6-luna46%

  • Planning and task decomposition

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads88%
    gpt-6-luna29%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads80%
    gpt-6-luna49%

  • Debugging and code review

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads88%
    gpt-6-luna39%

  • Agentic coding

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads87%
    gpt-6-luna35%

  • Tool and function calling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads90%
    gpt-6-luna52%

  • SQL and query writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads86%
    gpt-6-luna48%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads87%
    gpt-6-luna54%

  • Professional writing

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads91%
    gpt-6-luna59%

  • Conversational quality

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads90%
    gpt-6-luna54%

  • Multilingual ability

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads71%
    gpt-6-luna61%

  • Translation

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads87%
    gpt-6-luna57%

  • Summarization

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads82%
    gpt-6-luna37%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads87%
    gpt-6-luna39%

  • Professional domains

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads92%
    gpt-6-luna49%

  • Information extraction

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads89%
    gpt-6-luna57%

  • Classification and labeling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads82%
    gpt-6-luna62%

  • Long-context handling

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads56%
    gpt-6-luna22%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads91%
    gpt-6-luna55%

  • Structured output

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads97%
    gpt-6-luna70%

  • Factual accuracy

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads96%
    gpt-6-luna59%

  • Safety and alignment

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads94%
    gpt-6-luna59%

  • Steerability

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads93%
    gpt-6-luna53%

  • Output consistency

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6Leads95%
    gpt-6-luna80%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-611%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads59%

  • Cost efficiency

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-616%
    gpt-6-lunaLeads71%

  • Image understanding

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-672%
    gpt-6-lunaNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

98.13%

gpt-6-luna

92.86%

Average response time

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

6,959.2 ms

gpt-6-luna

47,470.23 ms

P95 API latency

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

30,000 ms

gpt-6-luna

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6: 98%gpt-6-luna: 92.6%
27 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6: 7,280 msgpt-6-luna: 48,342 ms
27 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-6: 30,000 msgpt-6-luna: 60,000 ms
27 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring

About anthropic/claude-opus-4-6About gpt-6-lunaanthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs gpt-5.6-solanthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs mistral-large-3:675banthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs gpt-6-solclaude-opus-5 vs gpt-6-lunaclaude-opus-4-8 vs gpt-6-lunagpt-6-luna vs muse-spark-1.3