claude-opus-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-opus-5vsgpt-6-luna
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-6-luna
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
claude-opus-5
text, image
gpt-6-luna
text
Vision
claude-opus-5Better fit
Supported
gpt-6-luna
Not supported
Reasoning
claude-opus-5Better fit
Supported
gpt-6-luna
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-opus-5 · leads in 27
83%
Strong
gpt-6-luna · leads in 2
52%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-opus-5Leads86%gpt-6-luna72%Logical reasoning
claude-opus-5Leads88%gpt-6-luna28%Mathematics
claude-opus-5Leads87%gpt-6-luna42%Scientific and technical depth
claude-opus-5Leads91%gpt-6-luna46%Planning and task decomposition
claude-opus-5Leads89%gpt-6-luna29%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-opus-5Leads79%gpt-6-luna49%Debugging and code review
claude-opus-5Leads88%gpt-6-luna39%Agentic coding
claude-opus-5Leads90%gpt-6-luna35%Tool and function calling
claude-opus-5Leads88%gpt-6-luna52%SQL and query writing
claude-opus-5Leads86%gpt-6-luna48%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-opus-5Leads88%gpt-6-luna54%Professional writing
claude-opus-5Leads91%gpt-6-luna59%Conversational quality
claude-opus-5Leads90%gpt-6-luna54%Multilingual ability
claude-opus-5Leads76%gpt-6-luna61%Translation
claude-opus-5Leads89%gpt-6-luna57%Summarization
claude-opus-5Leads92%gpt-6-luna37%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-opus-5Leads90%gpt-6-luna39%Professional domains
claude-opus-5Leads92%gpt-6-luna49%Information extraction
claude-opus-5Leads88%gpt-6-luna57%Classification and labeling
claude-opus-5Leads82%gpt-6-luna62%Long-context handling
claude-opus-5Leads93%gpt-6-luna22%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-opus-5Leads88%gpt-6-luna55%Structured output
claude-opus-5Leads90%gpt-6-luna70%Factual accuracy
claude-opus-5Leads93%gpt-6-luna59%Safety and alignment
claude-opus-5Leads91%gpt-6-luna59%Steerability
claude-opus-5Leads92%gpt-6-luna53%Output consistency
claude-opus-5Leads92%gpt-6-luna80%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-opus-512%gpt-6-lunaLeads59%Cost efficiency
claude-opus-521%gpt-6-lunaLeads71%Image understanding
claude-opus-581%gpt-6-lunaNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-opus-5
99.22%
gpt-6-luna
92.86%
Average response time
claude-opus-5
9,181.89 ms
gpt-6-luna
47,470.23 ms
P95 API latency
claude-opus-5
30,000 ms
gpt-6-luna
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5: 100%gpt-6-luna: 92.6%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5: 5,515 msgpt-6-luna: 48,342 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5: 10,000 msgpt-6-luna: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- claude-opus-5 supports image input while the other model does not.
- claude-opus-5 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- claude-opus-5 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.