claude-opus-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-opus-5vsgemma4:31b
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gemma4:31b
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
claude-opus-5Better fit
1,000,000 tokens
gemma4:31b
262,000 tokens
Input formats
claude-opus-5
text, image
gemma4:31b
text
Vision
claude-opus-5Better fit
Supported
gemma4:31b
Not supported
Reasoning
claude-opus-5Better fit
Supported
gemma4:31b
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-opus-5 · leads in 27
83%
Strong
gemma4:31b · leads in 2
34%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-opus-5Leads86%gemma4:31b33%Logical reasoning
claude-opus-5Leads88%gemma4:31b19%Mathematics
claude-opus-5Leads87%gemma4:31b31%Scientific and technical depth
claude-opus-5Leads91%gemma4:31b34%Planning and task decomposition
claude-opus-5Leads89%gemma4:31b17%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-opus-5Leads79%gemma4:31b33%Debugging and code review
claude-opus-5Leads88%gemma4:31b29%Agentic coding
claude-opus-5Leads90%gemma4:31b26%Tool and function calling
claude-opus-5Leads88%gemma4:31b29%SQL and query writing
claude-opus-5Leads86%gemma4:31b34%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-opus-5Leads88%gemma4:31b33%Professional writing
claude-opus-5Leads91%gemma4:31b31%Conversational quality
claude-opus-5Leads90%gemma4:31b23%Multilingual ability
claude-opus-5Leads76%gemma4:31b44%Translation
claude-opus-5Leads89%gemma4:31b32%Summarization
claude-opus-5Leads92%gemma4:31b31%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-opus-5Leads90%gemma4:31b29%Professional domains
claude-opus-5Leads92%gemma4:31b26%Information extraction
claude-opus-5Leads88%gemma4:31b35%Classification and labeling
claude-opus-5Leads82%gemma4:31b38%Long-context handling
claude-opus-5Leads93%gemma4:31b39%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-opus-5Leads88%gemma4:31b29%Structured output
claude-opus-5Leads90%gemma4:31b46%Factual accuracy
claude-opus-5Leads93%gemma4:31b34%Safety and alignment
claude-opus-5Leads91%gemma4:31b31%Steerability
claude-opus-5Leads92%gemma4:31b28%Output consistency
claude-opus-5Leads92%gemma4:31b57%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-opus-512%gemma4:31bLeads48%Cost efficiency
claude-opus-521%gemma4:31bLeads59%Image understanding
claude-opus-581%gemma4:31bNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-opus-5
99.22%
gemma4:31b
99.73%
Average response time
claude-opus-5
9,181.89 ms
gemma4:31b
6,204.99 ms
P95 API latency
claude-opus-5
30,000 ms
gemma4:31b
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5: 100%gemma4:31b: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5: 5,515 msgemma4:31b: 6,773 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5: 10,000 msgemma4:31b: 30,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- claude-opus-5 has a larger context window.
- claude-opus-5 supports image input while the other model does not.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.