deepseek-v4-pro
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
deepseek-v4-provsgemma4:31b
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gemma4:31b
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
deepseek-v4-proBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
gemma4:31b
262,000 tokens
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
deepseek-v4-pro
99.21%
gemma4:31b
99.7%
Average response time
deepseek-v4-pro
11,686.76 ms
gemma4:31b
5,467.27 ms
P95 API latency
deepseek-v4-pro
60,000 ms
gemma4:31b
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
deepseek-v4-pro: 100%gemma4:31b: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
deepseek-v4-pro: 621 msgemma4:31b: 6,970 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
deepseek-v4-pro: 2,000 msgemma4:31b: 30,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- deepseek-v4-pro has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- gemma4:31b recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.