LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Anthropic logo

claude-opus-4-8vsgemma4:31b

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

claude-opus-4-8

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

claude-opus-4-8Better fit

1,000,000 tokens

gemma4:31b

262,000 tokens

Input formats

claude-opus-4-8

text, image

gemma4:31b

text

Vision

claude-opus-4-8Better fit

Supported

gemma4:31b

Not supported

Reasoning

claude-opus-4-8Better fit

Supported

gemma4:31b

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

claude-opus-4-8 · leads in 27

85%

Strong

gemma4:31b · leads in 2

34%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    claude-opus-4-8Leads86%
    gemma4:31b33%
  • Logical reasoning

    claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    gemma4:31b19%
  • Mathematics

    claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    gemma4:31b31%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    gemma4:31b34%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    gemma4:31b17%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    claude-opus-4-8Leads80%
    gemma4:31b33%
  • Debugging and code review

    claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    gemma4:31b29%
  • Agentic coding

    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    gemma4:31b26%
  • Tool and function calling

    claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    gemma4:31b29%
  • SQL and query writing

    claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    gemma4:31b34%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    gemma4:31b33%
  • Professional writing

    claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    gemma4:31b31%
  • Conversational quality

    claude-opus-4-8Leads90%
    gemma4:31b23%
  • Multilingual ability

    claude-opus-4-8Leads77%
    gemma4:31b44%
  • Translation

    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    gemma4:31b32%
  • Summarization

    claude-opus-4-8Leads93%
    gemma4:31b31%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    gemma4:31b29%
  • Professional domains

    claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    gemma4:31b26%
  • Information extraction

    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    gemma4:31b35%
  • Classification and labeling

    claude-opus-4-8Leads85%
    gemma4:31b38%
  • Long-context handling

    claude-opus-4-8Leads94%
    gemma4:31b39%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    gemma4:31b29%
  • Structured output

    claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    gemma4:31b46%
  • Factual accuracy

    claude-opus-4-8Leads95%
    gemma4:31b34%
  • Safety and alignment

    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    gemma4:31b31%
  • Steerability

    claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    gemma4:31b28%
  • Output consistency

    claude-opus-4-8Leads95%
    gemma4:31b57%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    claude-opus-4-813%
    gemma4:31bLeads48%
  • Cost efficiency

    claude-opus-4-826%
    gemma4:31bLeads59%
  • Image understanding

    claude-opus-4-878%
    gemma4:31bNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

claude-opus-4-8

96.77%

gemma4:31b

99.73%

Average response time

claude-opus-4-8

13,573.98 ms

gemma4:31b

6,204.99 ms

P95 API latency

claude-opus-4-8

60,000 ms

gemma4:31b

30,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

claude-opus-4-8: 100%gemma4:31b: 100%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-opus-4-8: 2,396 msgemma4:31b: 6,773 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-opus-4-8: 10,000 msgemma4:31b: 30,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • claude-opus-4-8 has a larger context window.
  • claude-opus-4-8 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • gemma4:31b recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • gemma4:31b recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring