LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Anthropic logo

claude-opus-4-8vsgemini-3-flash

Google logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

claude-opus-4-8

Checking current pricing…

gemini-3-flash

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

claude-opus-4-8

1,000,000 tokens

gemini-3-flashBetter fit

1,048,576 tokens

Input formats

claude-opus-4-8

text, image

gemini-3-flash

text

Vision

claude-opus-4-8Better fit

Supported

gemini-3-flash

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

claude-opus-4-8 · leads in 25

85%

Strong

gemini-3-flash · leads in 4

71%

Moderate

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    claude-opus-4-8Leads86%
    gemini-3-flash67%
  • Logical reasoning

    claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    gemini-3-flash64%
  • Mathematics

    claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    gemini-3-flash66%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    gemini-3-flash63%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    gemini-3-flash63%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    claude-opus-4-8Leads80%
    gemini-3-flash59%
  • Debugging and code review

    claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    gemini-3-flash65%
  • Agentic coding

    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    gemini-3-flash72%
  • Tool and function calling

    claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    gemini-3-flash69%
  • SQL and query writing

    claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    gemini-3-flash70%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    gemini-3-flash53%
  • Professional writing

    claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    gemini-3-flash60%
  • Conversational quality

    claude-opus-4-8Leads90%
    gemini-3-flash60%
  • Multilingual ability

    claude-opus-4-877%
    gemini-3-flashLeads94%
  • Translation

    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    gemini-3-flash74%
  • Summarization

    claude-opus-4-8Leads93%
    gemini-3-flash72%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    gemini-3-flash75%
  • Professional domains

    claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    gemini-3-flash61%
  • Information extraction

    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    gemini-3-flash76%
  • Classification and labeling

    claude-opus-4-8Leads85%
    gemini-3-flash82%
  • Long-context handling

    claude-opus-4-894%
    gemini-3-flashLeads97%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    gemini-3-flash63%
  • Structured output

    claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    gemini-3-flash77%
  • Factual accuracy

    claude-opus-4-8Leads95%
    gemini-3-flash69%
  • Safety and alignment

    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    gemini-3-flash64%
  • Steerability

    claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    gemini-3-flash56%
  • Output consistency

    claude-opus-4-8Leads95%
    gemini-3-flash74%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    claude-opus-4-813%
    gemini-3-flashLeads93%
  • Cost efficiency

    claude-opus-4-826%
    gemini-3-flashLeads88%
  • Image understanding

    claude-opus-4-878%
    gemini-3-flashNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

claude-opus-4-8

96.77%

gemini-3-flash

87.03%

Average response time

claude-opus-4-8

13,573.98 ms

gemini-3-flash

5,576.7 ms

P95 API latency

claude-opus-4-8

60,000 ms

gemini-3-flash

30,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

claude-opus-4-8: 100%gemini-3-flash: 99.7%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-opus-4-8: 2,396 msgemini-3-flash: 5,803 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-opus-4-8: 10,000 msgemini-3-flash: 30,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • gemini-3-flash has a larger context window.
  • claude-opus-4-8 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • claude-opus-4-8 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • gemini-3-flash recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring