claude-opus-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-opus-5vsmuse-spark-1.3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
muse-spark-1.3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
claude-opus-5
text, image
muse-spark-1.3
text
Vision
claude-opus-5Better fit
Supported
muse-spark-1.3
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-opus-5 · leads in 27
83%
Strong
muse-spark-1.3 · leads in 2
29%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-opus-5Leads86%muse-spark-1.316%Logical reasoning
claude-opus-5Leads88%muse-spark-1.335%Mathematics
claude-opus-5Leads87%muse-spark-1.329%Scientific and technical depth
claude-opus-5Leads91%muse-spark-1.323%Planning and task decomposition
claude-opus-5Leads89%muse-spark-1.339%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-opus-5Leads79%muse-spark-1.324%Debugging and code review
claude-opus-5Leads88%muse-spark-1.333%Agentic coding
claude-opus-5Leads90%muse-spark-1.342%Tool and function calling
claude-opus-5Leads88%muse-spark-1.337%SQL and query writing
claude-opus-5Leads86%muse-spark-1.331%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-opus-5Leads88%muse-spark-1.332%Professional writing
claude-opus-5Leads91%muse-spark-1.326%Conversational quality
claude-opus-5Leads90%muse-spark-1.321%Multilingual ability
claude-opus-5Leads76%muse-spark-1.326%Translation
claude-opus-5Leads89%muse-spark-1.322%Summarization
claude-opus-5Leads92%muse-spark-1.313%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-opus-5Leads90%muse-spark-1.328%Professional domains
claude-opus-5Leads92%muse-spark-1.324%Information extraction
claude-opus-5Leads88%muse-spark-1.330%Classification and labeling
claude-opus-5Leads82%muse-spark-1.329%Long-context handling
claude-opus-5Leads93%muse-spark-1.36%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-opus-5Leads88%muse-spark-1.330%Structured output
claude-opus-5Leads90%muse-spark-1.340%Factual accuracy
claude-opus-5Leads93%muse-spark-1.320%Safety and alignment
claude-opus-5Leads91%muse-spark-1.325%Steerability
claude-opus-5Leads92%muse-spark-1.330%Output consistency
claude-opus-5Leads92%muse-spark-1.337%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-opus-512%muse-spark-1.3Leads44%Cost efficiency
claude-opus-521%muse-spark-1.3Leads55%Image understanding
claude-opus-581%muse-spark-1.3No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-opus-5
99.22%
muse-spark-1.3
0%
Average response time
claude-opus-5
9,181.89 ms
muse-spark-1.3
117,086.75 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5: 5,515 msmuse-spark-1.3: 263,946 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- claude-opus-5 supports image input while the other model does not.