LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Anthropic logo

claude-opus-5vsdeepseek-v4-flash:0731

DeepSeek logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

claude-opus-5

Checking current pricing…

deepseek-v4-flash:0731

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

claude-opus-5

1,000,000 tokens

deepseek-v4-flash:0731Better fit

1,024,000 tokens

Input formats

claude-opus-5

text, image

deepseek-v4-flash:0731

text

Vision

claude-opus-5Better fit

Supported

deepseek-v4-flash:0731

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

claude-opus-5 · leads in 26

83%

Strong

deepseek-v4-flash:0731 · leads in 2

66%

Moderate

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    claude-opus-5Leads86%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073153%
  • Logical reasoning

    claude-opus-5Leads88%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073168%
  • Mathematics

    claude-opus-587%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073187%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    claude-opus-5Leads91%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073171%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    claude-opus-5Leads89%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073166%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    claude-opus-5Leads79%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073176%
  • Debugging and code review

    claude-opus-5Leads88%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073179%
  • Agentic coding

    claude-opus-5Leads90%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073180%
  • Tool and function calling

    claude-opus-5Leads88%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073164%
  • SQL and query writing

    claude-opus-5Leads86%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073180%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    claude-opus-5Leads88%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073144%
  • Professional writing

    claude-opus-5Leads91%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073153%
  • Conversational quality

    claude-opus-5Leads90%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073151%
  • Multilingual ability

    claude-opus-5Leads76%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073168%
  • Translation

    claude-opus-5Leads89%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073160%
  • Summarization

    claude-opus-5Leads92%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073167%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    claude-opus-5Leads90%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073174%
  • Professional domains

    claude-opus-5Leads92%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073156%
  • Information extraction

    claude-opus-5Leads88%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073169%
  • Classification and labeling

    claude-opus-5Leads82%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073170%
  • Long-context handling

    claude-opus-5Leads93%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073189%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    claude-opus-5Leads88%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073158%
  • Structured output

    claude-opus-5Leads90%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073167%
  • Factual accuracy

    claude-opus-5Leads93%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073154%
  • Safety and alignment

    claude-opus-5Leads91%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073140%
  • Steerability

    claude-opus-5Leads92%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073153%
  • Output consistency

    claude-opus-5Leads92%
    deepseek-v4-flash:073160%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    claude-opus-512%
    deepseek-v4-flash:0731Leads82%
  • Cost efficiency

    claude-opus-521%
    deepseek-v4-flash:0731Leads79%
  • Image understanding

    claude-opus-581%
    deepseek-v4-flash:0731No image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

claude-opus-5

99.22%

deepseek-v4-flash:0731

99.96%

Average response time

claude-opus-5

9,181.89 ms

deepseek-v4-flash:0731

8,511.8 ms

P95 API latency

claude-opus-5

30,000 ms

deepseek-v4-flash:0731

30,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

claude-opus-5: 100%deepseek-v4-flash:0731: 100%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-opus-5: 5,515 msdeepseek-v4-flash:0731: 9,289 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-opus-5: 10,000 msdeepseek-v4-flash:0731: 30,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • deepseek-v4-flash:0731 has a larger context window.
  • claude-opus-5 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.

Keep exploring