claude-opus-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-opus-5vsgemini-3.6-flash-high
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gemini-3.6-flash-high
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
claude-opus-5
text, image
gemini-3.6-flash-high
text, json
Vision
claude-opus-5Better fit
Supported
gemini-3.6-flash-high
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-opus-5 · leads in 25
83%
Strong
gemini-3.6-flash-high · leads in 4
71%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-opus-5Leads86%gemini-3.6-flash-high73%Logical reasoning
claude-opus-5Leads88%gemini-3.6-flash-high70%Mathematics
claude-opus-5Leads87%gemini-3.6-flash-high73%Scientific and technical depth
claude-opus-5Leads91%gemini-3.6-flash-high68%Planning and task decomposition
claude-opus-5Leads89%gemini-3.6-flash-high67%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-opus-5Leads79%gemini-3.6-flash-high65%Debugging and code review
claude-opus-5Leads88%gemini-3.6-flash-high69%Agentic coding
claude-opus-5Leads90%gemini-3.6-flash-high69%Tool and function calling
claude-opus-5Leads88%gemini-3.6-flash-high76%SQL and query writing
claude-opus-5Leads86%gemini-3.6-flash-high73%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-opus-5Leads88%gemini-3.6-flash-high56%Professional writing
claude-opus-5Leads91%gemini-3.6-flash-high64%Conversational quality
claude-opus-5Leads90%gemini-3.6-flash-high65%Multilingual ability
claude-opus-576%gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads99%Translation
claude-opus-5Leads89%gemini-3.6-flash-high77%Summarization
claude-opus-5Leads92%gemini-3.6-flash-high53%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-opus-5Leads90%gemini-3.6-flash-high77%Professional domains
claude-opus-5Leads92%gemini-3.6-flash-high65%Information extraction
claude-opus-5Leads88%gemini-3.6-flash-high78%Classification and labeling
claude-opus-582%gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads85%Long-context handling
claude-opus-5Leads93%gemini-3.6-flash-high37%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-opus-5Leads88%gemini-3.6-flash-high70%Structured output
claude-opus-5Leads90%gemini-3.6-flash-high87%Factual accuracy
claude-opus-5Leads93%gemini-3.6-flash-high73%Safety and alignment
claude-opus-5Leads91%gemini-3.6-flash-high69%Steerability
claude-opus-5Leads92%gemini-3.6-flash-high62%Output consistency
claude-opus-5Leads92%gemini-3.6-flash-high77%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-opus-512%gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads91%Cost efficiency
claude-opus-521%gemini-3.6-flash-highLeads84%Image understanding
claude-opus-581%gemini-3.6-flash-highNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-opus-5
99.22%
gemini-3.6-flash-high
99.2%
Average response time
claude-opus-5
9,181.89 ms
gemini-3.6-flash-high
9,446.51 ms
P95 API latency
claude-opus-5
30,000 ms
gemini-3.6-flash-high
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5: 100%gemini-3.6-flash-high: 85.7%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5: 5,515 msgemini-3.6-flash-high: 24,682 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5: 10,000 msgemini-3.6-flash-high: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- claude-opus-5 supports image input while the other model does not.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.