LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Anthropic logo

claude-haiku-5-5vsllama-4-maverick

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

claude-haiku-5-5

Checking current pricing…

llama-4-maverick

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

claude-haiku-5-5

1,000,000 tokens

llama-4-maverickBetter fit

1,048,576 tokens

JSON mode

claude-haiku-5-5Better fit

Supported

llama-4-maverick

Not supported

Reasoning

claude-haiku-5-5Better fit

Supported

llama-4-maverick

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

claude-haiku-5-5 · leads in 28

68%

Moderate

llama-4-maverick · leads in 2

40%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads61%
    llama-4-maverick60%
  • Logical reasoning

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads65%
    llama-4-maverick26%
  • Mathematics

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads60%
    llama-4-maverick36%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads55%
    llama-4-maverick45%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads67%
    llama-4-maverick25%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads56%
    llama-4-maverick36%
  • Debugging and code review

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads64%
    llama-4-maverick33%
  • Agentic coding

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads70%
    llama-4-maverick34%
  • Tool and function calling

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads71%
    llama-4-maverick36%
  • SQL and query writing

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads64%
    llama-4-maverick34%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads63%
    llama-4-maverick48%
  • Professional writing

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads72%
    llama-4-maverick39%
  • Conversational quality

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads71%
    llama-4-maverick38%
  • Multilingual ability

    claude-haiku-5-558%
    llama-4-maverickLeads62%
  • Translation

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads66%
    llama-4-maverick47%
  • Summarization

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads72%
    llama-4-maverick57%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads68%
    llama-4-maverick38%
  • Professional domains

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads66%
    llama-4-maverick41%
  • Information extraction

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads72%
    llama-4-maverick27%
  • Classification and labeling

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads73%
    llama-4-maverick49%
  • Long-context handling

    claude-haiku-5-583%
    llama-4-maverickLeads89%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads71%
    llama-4-maverick19%
  • Structured output

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads79%
    llama-4-maverick7%
  • Factual accuracy

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads76%
    llama-4-maverick44%
  • Safety and alignment

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads76%
    llama-4-maverick41%
  • Steerability

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads75%
    llama-4-maverick31%
  • Output consistency

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads83%
    llama-4-maverick41%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads76%
    llama-4-maverick45%
  • Cost efficiency

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads68%
    llama-4-maverick46%
  • Image understanding

    claude-haiku-5-5Leads38%
    llama-4-maverick25%

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

claude-haiku-5-5

98.04%

llama-4-maverick

95.34%

Average response time

claude-haiku-5-5

18,800.08 ms

llama-4-maverick

4,496.14 ms

P95 API latency

claude-haiku-5-5

60,000 ms

llama-4-maverick

10,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

claude-haiku-5-5: 100%llama-4-maverick: 100%
22 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-haiku-5-5: 4,407 msllama-4-maverick: 4,572 ms
22 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-haiku-5-5: 10,000 msllama-4-maverick: 5,000 ms
22 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • llama-4-maverick has a larger context window.
  • claude-haiku-5-5 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • llama-4-maverick recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring