mistral-large-3:675b
Chat comparison
mistral-large-3:675bvsseed-2.0-mini
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
seed-2.0-mini
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
mistral-large-3:675bBetter fit
256,000 tokens
seed-2.0-mini
250,000 tokens
Input formats
mistral-large-3:675b
text, image
seed-2.0-mini
text
Vision
mistral-large-3:675bBetter fit
Supported
seed-2.0-mini
Not supported
JSON mode
mistral-large-3:675b
Not supported
seed-2.0-miniBetter fit
Supported
Reasoning
mistral-large-3:675bBetter fit
Supported
seed-2.0-mini
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
mistral-large-3:675b · leads in 26
49%
Weak
seed-2.0-mini · leads in 2
21%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
mistral-large-3:675bLeads52%seed-2.0-mini14%Logical reasoning
mistral-large-3:675bLeads57%seed-2.0-mini8%Mathematics
mistral-large-3:675bLeads62%seed-2.0-mini12%Scientific and technical depth
mistral-large-3:675bLeads62%seed-2.0-mini11%Planning and task decomposition
mistral-large-3:675bLeads55%seed-2.0-mini11%
Coding & tools
Code generation
mistral-large-3:675bLeads49%seed-2.0-mini15%Debugging and code review
mistral-large-3:675bLeads56%seed-2.0-mini13%Agentic coding
mistral-large-3:675bLeads54%seed-2.0-mini21%Tool and function calling
mistral-large-3:675bLeads54%seed-2.0-mini23%SQL and query writing
mistral-large-3:675bLeads55%seed-2.0-mini16%
Writing & language
Creative writing
mistral-large-3:675bLeads50%seed-2.0-mini12%Professional writing
mistral-large-3:675bLeads49%seed-2.0-mini15%Conversational quality
mistral-large-3:675bLeads50%seed-2.0-mini10%Multilingual ability
mistral-large-3:675bLeads86%seed-2.0-mini16%Translation
mistral-large-3:675bLeads59%seed-2.0-mini13%Summarization
mistral-large-3:675bLeads45%seed-2.0-mini19%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
mistral-large-3:675bLeads54%seed-2.0-mini16%Professional domains
mistral-large-3:675bLeads56%seed-2.0-mini12%Information extraction
mistral-large-3:675bLeads33%seed-2.0-mini24%Classification and labeling
mistral-large-3:675bLeads54%seed-2.0-mini23%Long-context handling
mistral-large-3:675bLeads44%seed-2.0-mini33%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
mistral-large-3:675bLeads36%seed-2.0-mini17%Structured output
mistral-large-3:675b9%seed-2.0-miniLeads38%Factual accuracy
mistral-large-3:675bLeads52%seed-2.0-mini16%Safety and alignment
mistral-large-3:675bLeads45%seed-2.0-mini17%Steerability
mistral-large-3:675bLeads46%seed-2.0-mini14%Output consistency
mistral-large-3:675bLeads54%seed-2.0-mini52%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
mistral-large-3:675b34%seed-2.0-miniLeads68%Cost efficiency
mistral-large-3:675b48%seed-2.0-mini48%Image understanding
mistral-large-3:675b17%seed-2.0-miniNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
mistral-large-3:675b
100%
seed-2.0-mini
100%
Average response time
mistral-large-3:675b
17,950.15 ms
seed-2.0-mini
6,796.87 ms
P95 API latency
mistral-large-3:675b
60,000 ms
seed-2.0-mini
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- mistral-large-3:675b has a larger context window.
- mistral-large-3:675b supports image input while the other model does not.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.