gpt-6.1-sol
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-6.1-solvsseed-2.0-mini
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
seed-2.0-mini
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gpt-6.1-solBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
seed-2.0-mini
250,000 tokens
Input formats
gpt-6.1-sol
text, image, json
seed-2.0-mini
text
Vision
gpt-6.1-solBetter fit
Supported
seed-2.0-mini
Not supported
Reasoning
gpt-6.1-solBetter fit
Supported
seed-2.0-mini
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-6.1-sol · leads in 28
86%
Strong
seed-2.0-mini · leads in 1
21%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-6.1-solLeads96%seed-2.0-mini14%Logical reasoning
gpt-6.1-solLeads89%seed-2.0-mini8%Mathematics
gpt-6.1-solLeads95%seed-2.0-mini12%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-6.1-solLeads90%seed-2.0-mini11%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-6.1-solLeads88%seed-2.0-mini11%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-6.1-solLeads86%seed-2.0-mini15%Debugging and code review
gpt-6.1-solLeads92%seed-2.0-mini13%Agentic coding
gpt-6.1-solLeads93%seed-2.0-mini21%Tool and function calling
gpt-6.1-solLeads90%seed-2.0-mini23%SQL and query writing
gpt-6.1-solLeads94%seed-2.0-mini16%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-6.1-solLeads82%seed-2.0-mini12%Professional writing
gpt-6.1-solLeads87%seed-2.0-mini15%Conversational quality
gpt-6.1-solLeads88%seed-2.0-mini10%Multilingual ability
gpt-6.1-solLeads86%seed-2.0-mini16%Translation
gpt-6.1-solLeads92%seed-2.0-mini13%Summarization
gpt-6.1-solLeads87%seed-2.0-mini19%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-6.1-solLeads95%seed-2.0-mini16%Professional domains
gpt-6.1-solLeads89%seed-2.0-mini12%Information extraction
gpt-6.1-solLeads96%seed-2.0-mini24%Classification and labeling
gpt-6.1-solLeads100%seed-2.0-mini23%Long-context handling
gpt-6.1-solLeads89%seed-2.0-mini33%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-6.1-solLeads88%seed-2.0-mini17%Structured output
gpt-6.1-solLeads99%seed-2.0-mini38%Factual accuracy
gpt-6.1-solLeads86%seed-2.0-mini16%Safety and alignment
gpt-6.1-solLeads79%seed-2.0-mini17%Steerability
gpt-6.1-solLeads84%seed-2.0-mini14%Output consistency
gpt-6.1-solLeads97%seed-2.0-mini52%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-6.1-sol40%seed-2.0-miniLeads68%Cost efficiency
gpt-6.1-solLeads49%seed-2.0-mini48%Image understanding
gpt-6.1-sol68%seed-2.0-miniNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-6.1-sol
98.17%
seed-2.0-mini
100%
Average response time
gpt-6.1-sol
18,340.6 ms
seed-2.0-mini
6,796.87 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-6.1-sol
60,000 ms
seed-2.0-mini
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6.1-sol: 91.7%seed-2.0-mini: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6.1-sol: 24,176 msseed-2.0-mini: 5,772 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6.1-sol: 60,000 msseed-2.0-mini: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-6.1-sol has a larger context window.
- gpt-6.1-sol supports image input while the other model does not.
- seed-2.0-mini recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.