minimax-m3
Chat comparison
minimax-m3vsmistral-large-3:675b
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
mistral-large-3:675b
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
minimax-m3Better fit
512,000 tokens
mistral-large-3:675b
256,000 tokens
Input formats
minimax-m3
text
mistral-large-3:675b
text, image
Vision
minimax-m3
Not supported
mistral-large-3:675bBetter fit
Supported
JSON mode
minimax-m3Better fit
Supported
mistral-large-3:675b
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
minimax-m3
100%
mistral-large-3:675b
100%
Average response time
minimax-m3
18,868.2 ms
mistral-large-3:675b
1,389 ms
P95 API latency
minimax-m3
60,000 ms
mistral-large-3:675b
5,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- minimax-m3 has a larger context window.
- mistral-large-3:675b supports image input while the other model does not.