LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

llama-4-maverickvsnemotron-3-nano:30b

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

llama-4-maverick

Checking current pricing…

nemotron-3-nano:30b

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

llama-4-maverickBetter fit

1,048,576 tokens

nemotron-3-nano:30b

1,000,000 tokens

Input formats

llama-4-maverick

text, image

nemotron-3-nano:30b

text

Vision

llama-4-maverickBetter fit

Supported

nemotron-3-nano:30b

Not supported

Reasoning

llama-4-maverick

Not supported

nemotron-3-nano:30bBetter fit

Supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

llama-4-maverick · leads in 16

40%

Weak

nemotron-3-nano:30b · leads in 12

39%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    llama-4-maverickLeads60%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b28%
  • Logical reasoning

    llama-4-maverick26%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads44%
  • Mathematics

    llama-4-maverick36%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads47%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    llama-4-maverickLeads45%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b41%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    llama-4-maverick25%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads43%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    llama-4-maverickLeads36%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b35%
  • Debugging and code review

    llama-4-maverick33%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads43%
  • Agentic coding

    llama-4-maverick34%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads48%
  • Tool and function calling

    llama-4-maverick36%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads37%
  • SQL and query writing

    llama-4-maverick34%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads39%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    llama-4-maverickLeads48%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b28%
  • Professional writing

    llama-4-maverickLeads39%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b24%
  • Conversational quality

    llama-4-maverickLeads38%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b29%
  • Multilingual ability

    llama-4-maverickLeads62%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b43%
  • Translation

    llama-4-maverickLeads47%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b35%
  • Summarization

    llama-4-maverickLeads57%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b47%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    llama-4-maverick38%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads40%
  • Professional domains

    llama-4-maverickLeads41%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b29%
  • Information extraction

    llama-4-maverickLeads27%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b25%
  • Classification and labeling

    llama-4-maverickLeads49%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b43%
  • Long-context handling

    llama-4-maverickLeads89%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b70%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    llama-4-maverick19%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads21%
  • Structured output

    llama-4-maverick7%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads8%
  • Factual accuracy

    llama-4-maverickLeads44%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b34%
  • Safety and alignment

    llama-4-maverickLeads41%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b29%
  • Steerability

    llama-4-maverick31%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b31%
  • Output consistency

    llama-4-maverickLeads41%
    nemotron-3-nano:30b40%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    llama-4-maverick45%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads71%
  • Cost efficiency

    llama-4-maverick46%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads80%
  • Image understanding

    llama-4-maverick25%
    nemotron-3-nano:30bNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

llama-4-maverick

95.34%

nemotron-3-nano:30b

98.3%

Average response time

llama-4-maverick

4,496.14 ms

nemotron-3-nano:30b

3,194.26 ms

P95 API latency

llama-4-maverick

10,000 ms

nemotron-3-nano:30b

10,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

llama-4-maverick: 100%nemotron-3-nano:30b: 99%
22 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

llama-4-maverick: 4,572 msnemotron-3-nano:30b: 4,647 ms
22 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

llama-4-maverick: 5,000 msnemotron-3-nano:30b: 10,000 ms
22 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • llama-4-maverick has a larger context window.
  • llama-4-maverick supports image input while the other model does not.
  • nemotron-3-nano:30b recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.

Keep exploring