kimi-k2.7-code
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
kimi-k2.7-codevsmistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
kimi-k2.7-codeBetter fit
256,000 tokens
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
32,000 tokens
Tool calling
kimi-k2.7-codeBetter fit
Supported
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
Not supported
Reasoning
kimi-k2.7-codeBetter fit
Supported
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
kimi-k2.7-code · leads in 25
53%
Moderate
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501 · leads in 4
31%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads37%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250124%Logical reasoning
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads59%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250115%Mathematics
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads68%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250124%Scientific and technical depth
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads56%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250120%Planning and task decomposition
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads62%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250111%
Coding & tools
Code generation
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads87%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250125%Debugging and code review
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads88%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250119%Agentic coding
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads81%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-25017%Tool and function calling
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads58%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-25017%SQL and query writing
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads84%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250127%
Writing & language
Creative writing
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads36%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250124%Professional writing
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads39%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250128%Conversational quality
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads41%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250124%Multilingual ability
kimi-k2.7-code55%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501Leads65%Translation
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads48%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250129%Summarization
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads48%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250115%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads59%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250116%Professional domains
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads43%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250117%Information extraction
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads52%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250128%Classification and labeling
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads44%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250136%Long-context handling
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads52%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250117%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads50%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250142%Structured output
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads59%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250149%Factual accuracy
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads44%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250136%Safety and alignment
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads39%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250131%Steerability
kimi-k2.7-codeLeads45%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-250135%Output consistency
kimi-k2.7-code53%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501Leads71%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
kimi-k2.7-code30%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501Leads75%Cost efficiency
kimi-k2.7-code34%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501Leads69%Image understanding
kimi-k2.7-codeNo image inputmistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
kimi-k2.7-code
99.83%
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
100%
Average response time
kimi-k2.7-code
6,571.81 ms
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
11,191.93 ms
P95 API latency
kimi-k2.7-code
30,000 ms
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
kimi-k2.7-code: 100%mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
kimi-k2.7-code: 1,138 msmistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501: 13,378 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
kimi-k2.7-code: 2,000 msmistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501: 30,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- kimi-k2.7-code has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- kimi-k2.7-code recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.
Keep exploring
About kimi-k2.7-codeAbout mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501kimi-k2.7-code vs nemotron-3-nano:30bclaude-opus-4-8 vs kimi-k2.7-codegemini-4-argon vs kimi-k2.7-codegpt-6-astra vs mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501claude-opus-5-5 vs mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501claude-sonnet-5 vs mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501