LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Google logo

gemini-4-argonvskimi-k2.7-code

Moonshot AI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

gemini-4-argon

Checking current pricing…

kimi-k2.7-code

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

gemini-4-argonBetter fit

1,000,000 tokens

kimi-k2.7-code

256,000 tokens

JSON mode

gemini-4-argon

Not supported

kimi-k2.7-codeBetter fit

Supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

gemini-4-argon · leads in 22

65%

Moderate

kimi-k2.7-code · leads in 7

53%

Moderate

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    gemini-4-argonLeads74%
    kimi-k2.7-code37%
  • Logical reasoning

    gemini-4-argonLeads70%
    kimi-k2.7-code59%
  • Mathematics

    gemini-4-argonLeads74%
    kimi-k2.7-code68%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    gemini-4-argonLeads75%
    kimi-k2.7-code56%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    gemini-4-argonLeads66%
    kimi-k2.7-code62%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    gemini-4-argon54%
    kimi-k2.7-codeLeads87%
  • Debugging and code review

    gemini-4-argon64%
    kimi-k2.7-codeLeads88%
  • Agentic coding

    gemini-4-argon65%
    kimi-k2.7-codeLeads81%
  • Tool and function calling

    gemini-4-argonLeads65%
    kimi-k2.7-code58%
  • SQL and query writing

    gemini-4-argon64%
    kimi-k2.7-codeLeads84%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    gemini-4-argonLeads59%
    kimi-k2.7-code36%
  • Professional writing

    gemini-4-argonLeads60%
    kimi-k2.7-code39%
  • Conversational quality

    gemini-4-argonLeads64%
    kimi-k2.7-code41%
  • Multilingual ability

    gemini-4-argonLeads100%
    kimi-k2.7-code55%
  • Translation

    gemini-4-argonLeads77%
    kimi-k2.7-code48%
  • Summarization

    gemini-4-argonLeads75%
    kimi-k2.7-code48%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    gemini-4-argonLeads76%
    kimi-k2.7-code59%
  • Professional domains

    gemini-4-argonLeads68%
    kimi-k2.7-code43%
  • Information extraction

    gemini-4-argon51%
    kimi-k2.7-codeLeads52%
  • Classification and labeling

    gemini-4-argonLeads71%
    kimi-k2.7-code44%
  • Long-context handling

    gemini-4-argonLeads89%
    kimi-k2.7-code52%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    gemini-4-argon44%
    kimi-k2.7-codeLeads50%
  • Structured output

    gemini-4-argon9%
    kimi-k2.7-codeLeads59%
  • Factual accuracy

    gemini-4-argonLeads73%
    kimi-k2.7-code44%
  • Safety and alignment

    gemini-4-argonLeads68%
    kimi-k2.7-code39%
  • Steerability

    gemini-4-argonLeads53%
    kimi-k2.7-code45%
  • Output consistency

    gemini-4-argonLeads63%
    kimi-k2.7-code53%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    gemini-4-argonLeads46%
    kimi-k2.7-code30%
  • Cost efficiency

    gemini-4-argonLeads57%
    kimi-k2.7-code34%
  • Image understanding

    gemini-4-argonNo image input
    kimi-k2.7-codeNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

gemini-4-argon

70.97%

kimi-k2.7-code

99.83%

Average response time

gemini-4-argon

48,603.09 ms

kimi-k2.7-code

6,571.81 ms

P95 API latency

gemini-4-argon

60,000 ms

kimi-k2.7-code

30,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

gemini-4-argon: 42.7%kimi-k2.7-code: 100%
27 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-4-argon: 49,932 mskimi-k2.7-code: 1,138 ms
27 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-4-argon: 60,000 mskimi-k2.7-code: 2,000 ms
27 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • gemini-4-argon has a larger context window.
  • kimi-k2.7-code recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • kimi-k2.7-code recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring