kimi-k2.6
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
kimi-k2.6vsnemotron-3-nano:30b
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
nemotron-3-nano:30b
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
kimi-k2.6
262,000 tokens
nemotron-3-nano:30bBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
Input formats
kimi-k2.6
text, json
nemotron-3-nano:30b
text
JSON mode
kimi-k2.6Better fit
Supported
nemotron-3-nano:30b
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
kimi-k2.6 · leads in 26
54%
Moderate
nemotron-3-nano:30b · leads in 3
39%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
kimi-k2.6Leads47%nemotron-3-nano:30b28%Logical reasoning
kimi-k2.6Leads60%nemotron-3-nano:30b44%Mathematics
kimi-k2.6Leads67%nemotron-3-nano:30b47%Scientific and technical depth
kimi-k2.6Leads53%nemotron-3-nano:30b41%Planning and task decomposition
kimi-k2.6Leads59%nemotron-3-nano:30b43%
Coding & tools
Code generation
kimi-k2.6Leads50%nemotron-3-nano:30b35%Debugging and code review
kimi-k2.6Leads58%nemotron-3-nano:30b43%Agentic coding
kimi-k2.6Leads60%nemotron-3-nano:30b48%Tool and function calling
kimi-k2.6Leads56%nemotron-3-nano:30b37%SQL and query writing
kimi-k2.6Leads59%nemotron-3-nano:30b39%
Writing & language
Creative writing
kimi-k2.6Leads44%nemotron-3-nano:30b28%Professional writing
kimi-k2.6Leads49%nemotron-3-nano:30b24%Conversational quality
kimi-k2.6Leads51%nemotron-3-nano:30b29%Multilingual ability
kimi-k2.6Leads65%nemotron-3-nano:30b43%Translation
kimi-k2.6Leads57%nemotron-3-nano:30b35%Summarization
kimi-k2.6Leads54%nemotron-3-nano:30b47%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
kimi-k2.6Leads62%nemotron-3-nano:30b40%Professional domains
kimi-k2.6Leads50%nemotron-3-nano:30b29%Information extraction
kimi-k2.6Leads64%nemotron-3-nano:30b25%Classification and labeling
kimi-k2.6Leads55%nemotron-3-nano:30b43%Long-context handling
kimi-k2.654%nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads70%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
kimi-k2.6Leads55%nemotron-3-nano:30b21%Structured output
kimi-k2.6Leads67%nemotron-3-nano:30b8%Factual accuracy
kimi-k2.6Leads51%nemotron-3-nano:30b34%Safety and alignment
kimi-k2.6Leads43%nemotron-3-nano:30b29%Steerability
kimi-k2.6Leads48%nemotron-3-nano:30b31%Output consistency
kimi-k2.6Leads56%nemotron-3-nano:30b40%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
kimi-k2.637%nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads71%Cost efficiency
kimi-k2.647%nemotron-3-nano:30bLeads80%Image understanding
kimi-k2.6No image inputnemotron-3-nano:30bNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
kimi-k2.6
100%
nemotron-3-nano:30b
98.3%
Average response time
kimi-k2.6
12,518.72 ms
nemotron-3-nano:30b
3,194.26 ms
P95 API latency
kimi-k2.6
30,000 ms
nemotron-3-nano:30b
10,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
kimi-k2.6: 100%nemotron-3-nano:30b: 99%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
kimi-k2.6: 16,670 msnemotron-3-nano:30b: 4,647 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
kimi-k2.6: 60,000 msnemotron-3-nano:30b: 10,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- nemotron-3-nano:30b has a larger context window.
- kimi-k2.6 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- nemotron-3-nano:30b recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.