kimi-k2.6
Chat comparison
kimi-k2.6vsmistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
kimi-k2.6Better fit
262,000 tokens
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
32,000 tokens
Input formats
kimi-k2.6
text, json
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
text
Tool calling
kimi-k2.6Better fit
Supported
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
Not supported
Reasoning
kimi-k2.6Better fit
Supported
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
kimi-k2.6
100%
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
100%
Average response time
kimi-k2.6
4,259.5 ms
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
4,366.12 ms
P95 API latency
kimi-k2.6
10,000 ms
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
30,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- kimi-k2.6 has a larger context window.