kimi-k2.6
Chat comparison
kimi-k2.6vsL3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
kimi-k2.6Better fit
262,000 tokens
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
8,000 tokens
Input formats
kimi-k2.6
text, json
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
text
Tool calling
kimi-k2.6Better fit
Supported
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
Not supported
JSON mode
kimi-k2.6Better fit
Supported
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
Not supported
Reasoning
kimi-k2.6Better fit
Supported
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
kimi-k2.6
100%
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
100%
Average response time
kimi-k2.6
4,259.5 ms
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
1,216.14 ms
P95 API latency
kimi-k2.6
10,000 ms
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
5,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- kimi-k2.6 has a larger context window.