LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Moonshot AI logo

kimi-k2.6vsL3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

Hugging Face logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

kimi-k2.6Better fit

262,000 tokens

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

8,000 tokens

Input formats

kimi-k2.6

text, json

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

text

Tool calling

kimi-k2.6Better fit

Supported

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

Not supported

JSON mode

kimi-k2.6Better fit

Supported

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

Not supported

Reasoning

kimi-k2.6Better fit

Supported

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

kimi-k2.6 · leads in 27

54%

Moderate

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo · leads in 2

13%

Weak

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    kimi-k2.6Leads47%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo10%
  • Logical reasoning

    kimi-k2.6Leads60%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo6%
  • Mathematics

    kimi-k2.6Leads67%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo11%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    kimi-k2.6Leads53%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo9%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    kimi-k2.6Leads59%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo4%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    kimi-k2.6Leads50%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo9%
  • Debugging and code review

    kimi-k2.6Leads58%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo8%
  • Agentic coding

    kimi-k2.6Leads60%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo2%
  • Tool and function calling

    kimi-k2.6Leads56%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo6%
  • SQL and query writing

    kimi-k2.6Leads59%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo8%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    kimi-k2.6Leads44%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo12%
  • Professional writing

    kimi-k2.6Leads49%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo9%
  • Conversational quality

    kimi-k2.6Leads51%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo6%
  • Multilingual ability

    kimi-k2.6Leads65%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo17%
  • Translation

    kimi-k2.6Leads57%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo9%
  • Summarization

    kimi-k2.6Leads54%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo4%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    kimi-k2.6Leads62%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo5%
  • Professional domains

    kimi-k2.6Leads50%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo6%
  • Information extraction

    kimi-k2.6Leads64%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo5%
  • Classification and labeling

    kimi-k2.6Leads55%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo13%
  • Long-context handling

    kimi-k2.6Leads54%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo7%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    kimi-k2.6Leads55%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo5%
  • Structured output

    kimi-k2.6Leads67%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo5%
  • Factual accuracy

    kimi-k2.6Leads51%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo12%
  • Safety and alignment

    kimi-k2.6Leads43%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo11%
  • Steerability

    kimi-k2.6Leads48%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo10%
  • Output consistency

    kimi-k2.6Leads56%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo43%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    kimi-k2.637%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-TurboLeads80%
  • Cost efficiency

    kimi-k2.647%
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-TurboLeads53%
  • Image understanding

    kimi-k2.6No image input
    L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-TurboNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

kimi-k2.6

100%

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

100%

Average response time

kimi-k2.6

12,518.72 ms

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

1,838.75 ms

P95 API latency

kimi-k2.6

30,000 ms

L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

5,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

kimi-k2.6: 100%L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo: 100%
22 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

kimi-k2.6: 16,670 msL3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo: 4,883 ms
22 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

kimi-k2.6: 60,000 msL3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo: 5,000 ms
22 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • kimi-k2.6 has a larger context window.

Keep exploring