gpt-image-2
Checking current pricing…
Image comparison
gpt-image-2vsgpt-image-2.5
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-image-2.5
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Output formats
gpt-image-2
text, image
gpt-image-2.5
image
Tool calling
gpt-image-2
Not supported
gpt-image-2.5Better fit
Supported
JSON mode
gpt-image-2
Not supported
gpt-image-2.5Better fit
Supported
Reasoning
gpt-image-2
Not supported
gpt-image-2.5Better fit
Supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-image-2
85.84%
gpt-image-2.5
94.59%
Average response time
gpt-image-2
31,932.02 ms
gpt-image-2.5
26,324.42 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-image-2
60,000 ms
gpt-image-2.5
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-image-2: 100%gpt-image-2.5: 75%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-image-2: 40,976 msgpt-image-2.5: 16,714 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-image-2: 60,000 msgpt-image-2.5: 30,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- gpt-image-2.5 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.