chroma-v.46-flash
Image comparison
chroma-v.46-flashvsgpt-image-2
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-image-2
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
chroma-v.46-flash
text
gpt-image-2
text, image
Output formats
chroma-v.46-flash
image
gpt-image-2
text, image
Vision
chroma-v.46-flash
Not supported
gpt-image-2Better fit
Supported
Tool calling
chroma-v.46-flashBetter fit
Supported
gpt-image-2
Not supported
JSON mode
chroma-v.46-flashBetter fit
Supported
gpt-image-2
Not supported
Reasoning
chroma-v.46-flashBetter fit
Supported
gpt-image-2
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
chroma-v.46-flash
100%
gpt-image-2
78.98%
Average response time
chroma-v.46-flash
20,275.53 ms
gpt-image-2
26,172.73 ms
P95 API latency
chroma-v.46-flash
60,000 ms
gpt-image-2
60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- gpt-image-2 supports image input while the other model does not.