gpt-6.1-sol
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gpt-6.1-solvsgpt-6-sol
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-6-sol
Checking current pricing…
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
gpt-6.1-sol · leads in 30
86%
Strong
gpt-6-sol · leads in 0
84%
Strong
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
gpt-6.1-solLeads96%gpt-6-sol93%Logical reasoning
gpt-6.1-solLeads89%gpt-6-sol87%Mathematics
gpt-6.1-solLeads95%gpt-6-sol93%Scientific and technical depth
gpt-6.1-solLeads90%gpt-6-sol88%Planning and task decomposition
gpt-6.1-solLeads88%gpt-6-sol86%
Coding & tools
Code generation
gpt-6.1-solLeads86%gpt-6-sol84%Debugging and code review
gpt-6.1-solLeads92%gpt-6-sol90%Agentic coding
gpt-6.1-solLeads93%gpt-6-sol91%Tool and function calling
gpt-6.1-solLeads90%gpt-6-sol88%SQL and query writing
gpt-6.1-solLeads94%gpt-6-sol92%
Writing & language
Creative writing
gpt-6.1-solLeads82%gpt-6-sol80%Professional writing
gpt-6.1-solLeads87%gpt-6-sol85%Conversational quality
gpt-6.1-solLeads88%gpt-6-sol86%Multilingual ability
gpt-6.1-solLeads86%gpt-6-sol84%Translation
gpt-6.1-solLeads92%gpt-6-sol89%Summarization
gpt-6.1-solLeads87%gpt-6-sol84%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
gpt-6.1-solLeads95%gpt-6-sol94%Professional domains
gpt-6.1-solLeads89%gpt-6-sol87%Information extraction
gpt-6.1-solLeads96%gpt-6-sol94%Classification and labeling
gpt-6.1-solLeads100%gpt-6-sol98%Long-context handling
gpt-6.1-solLeads89%gpt-6-sol87%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
gpt-6.1-solLeads88%gpt-6-sol86%Structured output
gpt-6.1-solLeads99%gpt-6-sol96%Factual accuracy
gpt-6.1-solLeads86%gpt-6-sol83%Safety and alignment
gpt-6.1-solLeads79%gpt-6-sol76%Steerability
gpt-6.1-solLeads84%gpt-6-sol82%Output consistency
gpt-6.1-solLeads97%gpt-6-sol91%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
gpt-6.1-solLeads40%gpt-6-sol39%Cost efficiency
gpt-6.1-solLeads49%gpt-6-sol47%Image understanding
gpt-6.1-solLeads68%gpt-6-sol63%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gpt-6.1-sol
98.17%
gpt-6-sol
87.5%
Average response time
gpt-6.1-sol
18,340.6 ms
gpt-6-sol
25,735 ms
P95 API latency
gpt-6.1-sol
60,000 ms
gpt-6-sol
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6.1-sol: 91.7%gpt-6-sol: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6.1-sol: 24,176 msgpt-6-sol: 1,319 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
gpt-6.1-sol: 60,000 msgpt-6-sol: 2,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…