claude-opus-4-8
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-opus-4-8vsgpt-6-sol
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-6-sol
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
claude-opus-4-8
text, image
gpt-6-sol
text, image, json
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-opus-4-8 · leads in 17
85%
Strong
gpt-6-sol · leads in 12
84%
Strong
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-opus-4-886%gpt-6-solLeads93%Logical reasoning
claude-opus-4-8Leads89%gpt-6-sol87%Mathematics
claude-opus-4-888%gpt-6-solLeads93%Scientific and technical depth
claude-opus-4-8Leads92%gpt-6-sol88%Planning and task decomposition
claude-opus-4-8Leads89%gpt-6-sol86%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-opus-4-880%gpt-6-solLeads84%Debugging and code review
claude-opus-4-889%gpt-6-solLeads90%Agentic coding
claude-opus-4-891%gpt-6-sol91%Tool and function calling
claude-opus-4-8Leads89%gpt-6-sol88%SQL and query writing
claude-opus-4-888%gpt-6-solLeads92%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-opus-4-8Leads88%gpt-6-sol80%Professional writing
claude-opus-4-8Leads92%gpt-6-sol85%Conversational quality
claude-opus-4-8Leads90%gpt-6-sol86%Multilingual ability
claude-opus-4-877%gpt-6-solLeads84%Translation
claude-opus-4-8Leads91%gpt-6-sol89%Summarization
claude-opus-4-8Leads93%gpt-6-sol84%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-opus-4-891%gpt-6-solLeads94%Professional domains
claude-opus-4-8Leads92%gpt-6-sol87%Information extraction
claude-opus-4-891%gpt-6-solLeads94%Classification and labeling
claude-opus-4-885%gpt-6-solLeads98%Long-context handling
claude-opus-4-8Leads94%gpt-6-sol87%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-opus-4-8Leads89%gpt-6-sol86%Structured output
claude-opus-4-892%gpt-6-solLeads96%Factual accuracy
claude-opus-4-8Leads95%gpt-6-sol83%Safety and alignment
claude-opus-4-8Leads91%gpt-6-sol76%Steerability
claude-opus-4-8Leads92%gpt-6-sol82%Output consistency
claude-opus-4-8Leads95%gpt-6-sol91%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-opus-4-813%gpt-6-solLeads39%Cost efficiency
claude-opus-4-826%gpt-6-solLeads47%Image understanding
claude-opus-4-8Leads78%gpt-6-sol63%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-opus-4-8
96.77%
gpt-6-sol
87.5%
Average response time
claude-opus-4-8
13,573.98 ms
gpt-6-sol
25,735 ms
P95 API latency
claude-opus-4-8
60,000 ms
gpt-6-sol
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-4-8: 100%gpt-6-sol: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-4-8: 2,396 msgpt-6-sol: 1,319 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-4-8: 10,000 msgpt-6-sol: 2,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…